×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

RISA-3D and the PCA design coefficients

RISA-3D and the PCA design coefficients

RISA-3D and the PCA design coefficients

(OP)
I am trying to compare results from the finite analysis program RISA-3D to the plate coefficients in "Rectangular Concrete Tanks" published by PCA.  All of the results from the RISA run seems to be lower than those listed in the PCA charts.  Does anyone have any suggestions about how to model the plate?  i.e. how thick, mesh size etc.?
Or has anyone else tried this exercise?

RE: RISA-3D and the PCA design coefficients

I have found that generally, finite element analyses tend to give lower results than other empirical methods.  I am not familiar with the PCA document you refer to but many handbooks on plate-type solutions tend to utilize approximate methods that give conservative results.  Also, you must be very careful in modeling with FE as they can be tricky.  Try using different mesh sizes (RISA has a quick way of sub-dividing elements down to smaller elements).  Also, watch your boundary condition assumptions as this can also affect your results.  

The FE results also assume a non-cracked section if you simply enter a constant thickness throughout your model.  Does the PCA document indicate any assumptions as to cracking and loss of stiffness?

RE: RISA-3D and the PCA design coefficients

(OP)
Actually, the coefficients were developed using SAP90.  "Results are provided from finite element analyses of two-dimensional plates subject to out-of-plane loads using SAP90.  Convergence analysis was made to ensure the quality of the results."  It goes on to say that the slab was assumed to act as a thin plate.  

This is why I am concerned that I am not getting results closer to the coefficients listed in the PCA charts.

RE: RISA-3D and the PCA design coefficients

I'm not familiar with the charts either but I gather that the PCA chart coefficients were developed using SAP 90.  How much difference are we talking about...you are comparing two different numerical methods (FEA)which use slightly different algorithms.  I would not expect the results be be exact but would expect the results to be somewhat close.  Perhaps you should check out the element dimensions and refine your mesh.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources