MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
(OP)
Hi all. Not a ME but I do appreciate engines and came across some internet forums and posts about "MBT" in regardless to best timing to use to produce maximum power. They were calling it "Minimum Best Timing".
(e.g.) http://www.ecutek.com/tuning/ignition/
It's been a while since I read over engineering texts on engines on a level that you folks probably deal with every day, but when I was more into it, "MBT" stood for "Maximum Brake Torque". Typically referenced with ignition timing as the timing required to produce maximum torque from an engine.
Are these folks off the rails here or have I just been away from this for too long?
thanks
(e.g.) http://www.ecutek.com/tuning/ignition/
It's been a while since I read over engineering texts on engines on a level that you folks probably deal with every day, but when I was more into it, "MBT" stood for "Maximum Brake Torque". Typically referenced with ignition timing as the timing required to produce maximum torque from an engine.
Are these folks off the rails here or have I just been away from this for too long?
thanks





RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
Cheers
Greg Locock
SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
At low power, you can advance significantly earlier because you have less material in the cylinder. This is where they go wrong, because they don't advance there. However, the lost potential is minimal because there is little power to achieve there in any case, so it's probably best that they ignore this operating point anyway. In any event, most manufacturers may be advanced near TDC at idle (unless they need the NOx benefit of retarding at that point), so there may be nothing to gain anyway.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
Bill
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
The advance should be set so the peak cylinder pressure occurs at approx 15deg ATDC. Then you have the best torque.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
My ununderstanding of MBT is "Minimum advance for Best Torque"
DING DING DING!!!
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
Some calibration engineers will find MBT and always retard 3deg or so, depending on fuel to maintain a safe margin even still.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
When knock limited, there is a distinct sharp point when knock starts as the timing is advanced. I never tested an engine where the timing was purely limited by torque.
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
- Steve
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
With spark timing things, as always, are a compromise. If you have an engine that is air limited then yes, wind away the spark until you find the torque peak at any given air load. However, were one to find themselves with a knock limited engine (especially turbocharged and/or out of the stoich region) then the order of the day is in fact LBT/MBT for the best torque. Unless that is you have a close loop EGT control.
In some older gen. systems the open loop spark is always mapped "safe" but with the advent of adaptive knock & EGT control those practices have all but vanished, unless emissions are compromised.
JSteve2 is actually quite wrong suggesting that the best ignition point is at TDC - in the real world gas dynamics etc detract so much from the ideal model that it becomes useless apart from a teaching aid. Judging by his presumption that emissions are a factor at full load says to me that he must work on sit on lawn mowers???
In my experience, on high performance engines, knock will always be encountered first. If this is not the case at full load then your VE is too low.
As it actually stands most modelling of spakr sweeps I have done in part load regions the best curve fit for a sweep is an X^2 : X^3 hybrid spline with MBT as the knot point.
Anyway
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
As far as emissions - the engines I work on are about as far from lawnmowers as possible. My guess is that the engines you work on are not in a challenging emissions regulation environment. In the engines I work on emissions are a factor at every operating point, and since full load racks up horsepower quickly, it's even more of a factor there.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
I think you will find that the theoretical optimum for MBT is the position of 50% MFB at 8-10 deg TDC, depending on wrist pin offset. Which also ties in pretty well with the centre of area of the NMEP graph on a pCrank plot.
Anyway, I can only guess that a statement like:-
"In the engines I work on emissions are a factor at every operating point"
means that you work on steady state diesels for off highway or something such like because I cant think of a single engine that is tested across its speed/load operating range on a FTP75 or MVEG-B.........
Anyways chill out, we are supposed to be grown ups.
MS
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
I also think you are being a bit precious.
Your earlier statement was flawed in several ways and Matty called you on it, albeit in a rather blunt and undiplomatic way.
Think about the lesson and get over the delivery method.
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
My statement was not flawed in several ways, and although it doesn't bother me personally I think it would be a disservice to the purpose of these forums to simply accept a mis-statement.
However, as our primary disagreement has been where we choose to use a fine or broad brush stroke, I'll withdraw. I will think about the lesson.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
Basically, if combustion starts too soon, the gas pushes back on the piston as it is coming up in the compression stroke, creating negative work which reduces torque. If the spark is too late, peak cylinder pressure is reduced, and hence, so is expansion work. So there is an optimum spark for maximum torque. If one were to draw out a curve of torque vs advance, (starting out below MBT), as spark is advanced torque will increase until MBT timing is reached, after which point further advance will cause torque to go back down. The top of the curve is somewhat flat, so the percentage increase in tq drops off as spark advance approaches MBT.
In the ideal Otto cycle, MBT timing would be at TDC, as mentioned above. But due to the non-zero burn duration of a real engine, MBT timing is not at TDC as mattsooty mentioned.
I have also heard it referred to as mean best timing, but since MBT depends on engine speed and load, that terminology just doesn't seem to fit, in my opinion.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
That sounds very logical to my feeble brain and fits pretty well with my understanding.
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
"Sometimes called Minimum advance for Best Torque"
So if the esteemed ICE profs can't agree, the water does seem somewhat murky.
- Steve
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
In reality, a perfectly realized event like this would, of course, break a number of things. The torque is proportional to the area under the P-V curve that ends up realized as mechanical work at the crankshaft. The force on the bearing is proportional to the cylinder pressure. Therefore, you want to keep the peak pressure capped at some maximum (for other reasons too). The reason you don't want early pressure is due to entropy losses (by having to compress your expanding gas before getting the energy back) and increased heat losses due in part to very high cylinder temperatures. The reason you don't want late pressure is because you are combusting into an expanding volume which will result in a net longer combustion event, lower pressures, and greater thermal losses.
If you imagine the pressure generated as a skewed bell curve, and recall that pressure generated before TDC is extremely costly (see above) then you will see that a cost function can place the center of mass of the bell curve onto TDC and then begin shifting it right until the inefficiency before TDC is just about equal to the inefficiency after TDC and that will position you very close to the best realizable timing. You may still have a maximum cylinder pressure limit that pushes you slightly farther right, but for most operating points of the engine probably not. For example, an engine that achieves max torque at 10 DBTDC at 50% load will probably have to retard that a few degrees at full load to avoid exceeding peak cylinder pressure.
Finally, even if you get all that worked out, you still have to check emissions. Even though my esteemed colleague indicates that engine manufacturers do not check every operating point for emissions, the fact is that they do (to the extent possible), and especially at peak torque and power. The reason for this is that the engine must operate away from the test points in substantially the same way that it operates at the test points, and the peak points are the first points the regulating body will ask about, although anything is fair game. Therefore the peak torque points will certainly be checked and may well have some adjustments due to emissions.
To the point of the OP - it's a pretty good system to advance the timing until you reach the torque plateau, and then stop. Further advances yield little in the way of extra torque (thus the plateau) and greatly increase cylinder pressures (and therefore mechanical loads) and emissions. Even after you do this, you may have to further tweak due to emissions.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
Perhaps we should just admit that MBT is the spark timing beyond which we do not wish to advance, and leave the derivation of the initialism to the crossword enthusiasts.
Cheers
Greg Locock
SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
Cheers
Greg Locock
SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
GregLocock: I have the heywood book "I.C.E. Fundementals" and that's where I was used to reading about MBT but I didn't recall the sentence you quoted. Thanks for pointing that out though.
BC2003: Thanks for that as well. I used to race mustangs back in the 90s. :) I'm with you on the explanation for MBT.
The "minimum best timing" sounded hokey to me. It seemed like someone was making up words to try and describe the acronym after having forgotten what it stood for. After rearranging the words a bit to get "minimum timing required for best torque" that sounds a lot better.
In the end it appears it's more of an opinion thing but it's interesting re Greg's comment where Heywood referred to MBT as "the minimum advance for best torque" as a previous reference no longer used as often as the "max brake torque" wording.
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
Ie, little throttle opening , at 4000+ revs, will get away with alot of advance
but a lot of throttle openning, IE WOT, will need a lot less
also when the engine, is at its most efficiant, due to a number of things, , but at this speed/throttle openning, the timing can be almost TDC, where as 1000rpm more, at same throttle position, it may well be 25 or more degs BTDC
this has been bourne out by the ability to ..map.. an engine with a laptop and a screen, to see exactly where the ..best.. spark will occur
and if set to ..auto map.. then the timing is set by the comp, using a variety of sensors ,.
and is very different for a lot of different speed /load ranges,
also heat ,and air temp play a big part in it too,.
So I would say that there is no such thing as MBT,
as it alters almost constantly, on a car engine,.
IE, 80 degs water, 20 degs air, at 4000 rpm, wot = 25 degs btdc
105 water, 60 degs air , wot =16 btdc
so how can one set the the mbt , when it changes constantly,
with air/water temp, throttle angle,
ALL at the same revs !!!!!!
MBT on a static engine/generator ,where every thing is running just right , then ..yes..,
regards Marcus
One does nae have to know how some thing works, to know that it is nae working right
s545.photo bucket.com /albums/hh 369/marcus aurailius/
http://
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
MS
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
RE: MBT (Minimum Best Timing ?)
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules