×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Vessel with non-circular (hexagonal) OD
2

Vessel with non-circular (hexagonal) OD

Vessel with non-circular (hexagonal) OD

(OP)
Is there any logical way (besides FEA) to take credit for additional material available when considering a shell with a non-circular OD in comparison to a regular cylindrical shell? In order to clarify, if I were to compare a cylinder with ID=3" and OD=4.5" (i.e. wall thickness of .25" all around) and a second shell made from a hexagonal bar with a bored ID=3" and OD such that wall thickness is at least .25" at the min thickness section, is there a way to qualify the latter for higher pressures at similar temperatures?
I did consider Sec VIII Div 1 Appendix 13, but the it does not seem to apply to hexagonal cross-sections.
Thanks much to all for your thoughts!

RE: Vessel with non-circular (hexagonal) OD

(OP)
Sorry for the typo on my first post, I meant an OD of 3.5" with wall thickness of .25 all round!

RE: Vessel with non-circular (hexagonal) OD

ME231-

I would suspect that you will see no credit for the excess thickness: The classic stress = PR/t formula can be easily derived from a free body diagram of a 180° section, determining the force the pressure exerts and the cross sectional area available to resist that force. I can take your section and cut it such that the stress remains the same. Thus, I see no additional strength provided by the excess thickness.

If I were to run a FEA of this, I would expect to see higher stress in the "thin" sections due to the bending moment imparted by the existence of the non-uniform shell. Then I'd have to classify the stress to determine how much is primary membrane, how much is primary bending... But primary membrane is primary membrane and will not be allowed more than the basic allowable stress.

jt
 

RE: Vessel with non-circular (hexagonal) OD

jte is right. For a cylinder of even wall thickness the Hoop stress (which calculates tensile stress on the wall thickness) is the same all over, for a shell of uneven thickness then the thicker cross-sections have lower stress but the thinner cross-sections still have higher stress and, you know, it is always the highest stress that governs so you cannot take the credit of the thicker wall sections of a hexagonal outside shape.

RE: Vessel with non-circular (hexagonal) OD

(OP)
thank you both for your insights

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources