×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASCE 7-05 foundation question
2

ASCE 7-05 foundation question

ASCE 7-05 foundation question

(OP)
Hopefully this question hasn't been asked before.

Section 12.13.4 of ASCE 7-05 is titled "Reduction of foundation Overturning" and basically allows for a 25% reduction of the overturning effects at the soil-foundation interface as long as the ELFA was used and the structure is not an inverted pendulum.  Does this section mean we are allowed to reduce the seismic loads by 25% when applying the loads to the 0.6D + 0.7E load combinations in the calculation for overturning?   Basically ending up with an effective 0.6D + .525E load combination (0.6D + 0.75*0.7E) for overturning?
 

RE: ASCE 7-05 foundation question

I believe that to be a true statement, but I also believe that it's for soil bearing pressures only - i.e. not for the strength design (rebar) of the footing.

RE: ASCE 7-05 foundation question

(OP)
Thank you for your reply.

I interpret this to apply to stability against overturning and bearing pressure.  I agree that you would not include this reduction in the design of the footing itself (for moments and shears).

This also appears to be a requirement that appears in ASCE 7-05 (I can't find it in ASCE 7-02).
 

RE: ASCE 7-05 foundation question

I have never seen that section of the code before and it is most certainly new.  

This causes me to vent a bit here.  Why the heck doesn't ASCE-7 provide at least some explanatory language in the commmentary for totally new code provisions?!  ACI and AISC all do a way, way, way better job of helping engineers understand and track code changes.  

What's funny is that the ASCE commentary then refers us to the NEHRP commentary and the 1999 SEAOC blue book.  Both good references for sure.  But, I am not confident that either of them will end up explaining where this code provision came from.  

End of vent....  blood pressure returning to normal.  :)  

RE: ASCE 7-05 foundation question

2
That provision has been around for quite a while - just in various places - See IBC 2000 Section 1801.2.1.  

As IBC is moving to push more technical content to the referenced standards provisions (such as this one) get pushed out to ASCE 7 etc.   

RE: ASCE 7-05 foundation question

WillisV -

Thanks for pointing that out. I do sort of remember that provision of IBC. Though, for some reason my brain couldn't make the connection between using 75% of the demand and instead using a 25% reduction....  Maybe it has something to do with being a California engineer and taking such joy in actively ignoring the IBC for so much of the past 10 years.  

To me, the ASCE section reads as if it applies to both soil bearing and overturning stability (but not sliding).

However, reading the IBC section makes it a bit more difficult to come to that same conclusion.  

For now, I don't think I'd apply it for soil bearing. Especially since I'm probably already taking a 25% force reduction (or a 33% increase to my bearing pressure) based on the load combination.   

RE: ASCE 7-05 foundation question

To add to Josh's venting above, why do they put such ambiguous provisions in there to start with.  In this case, it is a liberal provision that if applied incorrectly will get people in trouble.

Does uplift count as an "overturning effect". If so, I guess you can make your footings 25% lighter (if uplift controls).  

RE: ASCE 7-05 foundation question

I think the IBC is a bit clearer. Rather than calling it overturning effects it calls it soil-structure interaction effects due to seismic loads. So that would include all the forces arising from seismic loads which would make your effective combination of (0.6D + 0.75*0.7E) correct. In fact all earthquake combinations would have a 0.75 factor on them as far as the soil is concerned.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources