Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...I am so glad that I found your site, it is an excellent resource and has helped me greatly..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
racp12 (Mechanical)
28 Jul 09 14:41
Regarding API 650, 11th ed. with Addendum 1, I am doubtful about some statements regarding wall thickness.
According to para. 5.6.4.2,"required shell thickness for each course shall be the greater of the design shell thickness plus corrosion allowance (t1d) or the hydrostatic test shell thickness (t1t), but the total shell thickness shall not be less than the shell thickness required by 5.6.1.1, 5.6.1.3 and 5.6.1.4".
Under appendix K, para. K.2.1,for wall thickness calculation in accordance with the variable point method, for the hydro test condition, t1=t1t, and t1<= tpt

But, following 5.6.4.2, what if t1d is greater than t1t? I have tried to calculate wall ticknesses for a 44 m diameter, 21 m tall atmospheric tank. Checked calculated values for first course are t1t=22.06 mm and tpt=21.46 mm. This is not logical according to App. K.
Taking into account these results, it appears that there is a conflict between the mentioned paragraphs.
I insist, the calculations have been checked. I would like to know either if my interpretation is right or if there is a conflict in the code
 
JStephen (Mechanical)
29 Jul 09 8:18
I think API-650 is saying that for the test condition, t1 need not be greater than tpt, not that it will always calculate smaller.
rab1944 (Structural)
30 Jul 09 10:12
If you had a very light design specific gravity, the test condition (tt)could conceivably be of a greater thickness than that of the design condition (td).
racp12 (Mechanical)
2 Aug 09 22:46
rab1944,
Fluid is methanol. Specific gravity is 0.77


 
rab1944 (Structural)
3 Aug 09 13:47
This is not enough information.  Pick you material, get your Sd and St stresses from Table 5-2b, make sure the material is appropriate for the design metal temperature and run it through the 1-foot design in Section 5.6.3.  I hope you the best.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close