×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Eductors

Eductors

Eductors

(OP)
Anyone had any success using a portable eductor to improve flow on a gas well using a high flowing producing gas well as the driver ?

RE: Eductors

Yes

RE: Eductors

it's called gas lift system. A variation is the plunger lift where you don't need a eductor.

RE: Eductors

dcasto,
That isn't quite right.  The technology of eductors/ejectors are really closer to a standard compressor than it is to gas lift and has almost nothing to do with plungers.  

What I did for BP was set up a series of ejectors (compressible power fluid, the Oil & Gas industry mistakenly refers to any non-steam thermocompressor as an "eductor") designed to provide Critical Flow (using Coleman's equation) up the tubing while the bulk of the flow went up the annulus.  This significantly flattened the decline in a group of wells.

I described the application of thermocompressors in an Oil & Gas Journal article a few years ago (there is a copy at http://www.muleshoe-eng.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/oilandgasjournalarticle.pdf).  Basically the ejector doesn't care where the power fluid comes from as long as it is at the right pressure and the right mass flow rate.  I've designed a couple that use pressure wasted across a choke to suck on other wells and they work well.  The most famous example was the CalTech Eductor that was installed on BP's Indefatigable Field in the North Sea to use excess pressure to suck on an adjacent Shell platform.
 

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
www.muleshoe-eng.com
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

"Life is nature's way of preserving meat"  The Master on Dr. Who

RE: Eductors

(OP)
I'm actually dealing with Caltech as a supplier (they rent the units) I'm not too familiar with Coleman's equation, does it deal with nozzle sizes and min/max driver pressures/velocities ?

RE: Eductors

In November, 1969 a man named R.G. Turner from Baker Oil Tools published a paper in JPT asserting that at some increasing gas velocity the ability of a gas to carry liquid upward in a vertical conduit begins improving.  This velocity was termed "critical velocity" (not to be confused with the other 10 things that are called "critical velocity" in fluid mechanics).  Mr. Turner did all of his experiments at pretty high pressure and his equations significantly overstate the minimum velocity at lower pressures.  

A few years later a researcher at Exxon named Coleman revisited the experiment at much lower pressures and published basically the same equation with a lower constant that seems to work better at mid-triple-digit flowing tubing pressures.  This equation is commonly called the "Exxon Equation" or the "Coleman Equation" and it is used by a lot of people working in gas well deliquification to try to determine the flow rate that just exceeds the onset of liquid loading.  The trade off is that the higher the flow rate the more pressure is lost to friction, minimizing that parasitic pressure-drop is worth a bunch of additional reserves recovery.

To bring the story up to date a guy named M. Li presented a paper at the 2001 SPE Permian Basin Oil & Gas Recovery Conference in Midland where he got a new data set under 100 psig and came up with a constant that was considerably lower than Coleman's, but that was done in this decade so very few people have accepted it yet (8 years is just too new for our industry).

I sized the ejectors I used in the San Juan Basin to provide a flow rate up the tubing that was slightly in excess of the "critical rate" predicted by the Coleman Equation.

Caltech does pretty good with custom applications.  They are a bit more conservative than I like (i.e., they tend to want higher power-gas pressure and higher power-gas mass flow rates than I get from other vendors, but not hugely so).  I love these projects that make productive use of otherwise wasted energy.  If there is any way I can help, my e-mail address is on my web page.
 

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
www.muleshoe-eng.com
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

"Life is nature's way of preserving meat"  The Master on Dr. Who

RE: Eductors

You might want to start a new thread instead of hyjacking this one.
 

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
www.muleshoe-eng.com
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

"Life is nature's way of preserving meat"  The Master on Dr. Who

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources