×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
What are the recommended materials for re potting GE Magneblast breaker bottles. Ours are showing signs of cracking and seperation between the bar and potting compound. We were smelling ozone, and called in a specialist. He chiseled out the old potting compound re wrapped the bars with silicone tape, and bought some tar from Home Depot to fill the bottle up with. We had a few bus joints that showed signs of partial discharge also. The joints were enclosed within a plastic case tied together with string and filled with a tar like compound. These cases were removed, the bolts retorqued, and were covered with silicone tape. The cases were not reinstalled.

Is there a special compound that should be used, or is roofing tar sufficient? We would like to inspect the bus during our outage, but are unsure whether to use the same contractor.  

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

That's an interesting one.

In the absence of hard data, I seem to recall that the original potting compound was derived from pine tar, and the roofing compound you're likely to get from Home Depot is of petroleum origin, but as long as it does not contain conductive fillers such as carbon black, it should be sufficient.

I think I'd have created a test sample for testing breakdown voltage out of a couple of electrodes and a bit of both compounds and then subjected them to elevated test voltages, but that's because I worked with some folks who were trying to keep archaic equipment going.

The old guys who used to KNOW about potting compounds and such are getting hard to find.  Sounds like you found one.

Please keep us informed of further activities.

old field guy

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

Many of the breaker rebuilding shops rebuild/retrofit Magnablast bottle assemblies.  I am sure Zog or others will fill you in regarding the potting compound. I would be more concerned about the compound viscosity being used then its electrical insulating properties. You don't want the compound seeping/dripping onto the breaker over time.

I am not convinced MC switchgear or bus joints were ever "PD Free", or meant to be, when they were new.  Many mfg did go to great lengths to do the best they could to insure bus joints made in the field would last. Dux Seal, Solorite with semicon tape were mostly used.  ITE used two hard plastic covers with a hemispherical shape on each that was painted with a semi conducting paint.  The bolted joints had thin copper "tangs" that made contact with painted semi conducting surface. This would act as a "corona ring" of sorts.  The covers were simply taped together in place.  No filler at all.  This arrangement worked well and accomplished much more then fillers and tapes.  The basic rubber boots on MC gear joints used today make no attempt to "suppress" corona or PD as far as I know.

I am sure the experts will help me out here.

 

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

I assume the OP is asking about the pole peices themselves, there are no "bottles" on a magneblast. We actually manufacture replacement poles for these, I havent done a feild repair in 10 years on the poles, I just replace them with new ones. I can't recall off the top of my head what material we used on theat last repair (One of those 36 hour straight jobs) but it was not something you get at HD. Let me go look at the job again and see if I can find what we used. I think it is in the AM maintenece manual.   

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
I'm talking about the primary disconnecting devices in the switchgear, not the breakers. I found reference in the manual to GE D50H49 compound, and the procedure for heating and pouring it. I can't find any other info on this compound online, so I'll probably have to call GE and see if they have a suitable replacement.

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
I should also say that this switchgear was commissioned in 1959, and has ran very reliably so far. We have an opportunity to inspect the primary side of the system for what is probably the first time in 50yrs, and would like to be prepared to restore these joints if it is deemed that further inspection is necessary.  

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

Ah, those bottles, my mind was thinking about vacuum bottles for some reason, wasn't thinking about the cells. I think you can still get that stuff from GE.  

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
I tried emailing GE, with no results. Is this a common repair on this old switchgear? The procedure out of the manual is pretty straightforward, but I need to find a source for the materials.

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

As mentioned earlier.  One of the problems typically encountered is the dripping of the "Tar" or "pitch" through the bottle assy. onto the breaker pole piece and breaker.  I have been told that good results can be had by removing the old tar out, cleaning the assy and putting about an inch (1") of fast dry epoxy in the bottom of the assy, then simply refilling with the original removed tar after melting into a liquid form.  Messy but functional.  The epoxy prevents leakage of tar from dripping onto the breaker over time.  I would imagine one could use G&W Novoid compound with excellent results also. Just my opinion of course.

http://www.gwelec.com/support/msds.cfm

 

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
Still haven't heard back from GE. The Novoid looks like it would be a good substitute for the original compound.

 

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

A few further questions if you don't mind:

When you wrote about finding "evidence of PD" does this mean you found visual or audible indications? Can you describe what you found associated with the bottles and joints other then shrinkage and cracking of the compound.  What is the voltage class of the equipment?

I am unsure of the risk vs reward for your situation.  Are you removing the bottle assemblies from the switchgear to perform the re-potting operation?  This would be very time consuming. You run the very real risk of altering the alignment of the primary tulips relative the breaker.  This would be catastrophic should you drive the breaker up into the mis aligned primary disconnect and break the porcelain housing.

Thank you.

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
The smell of ozone had been real strong over the last few months, and after changing breakers and inspecting the load side, we decided to open up the line side bus overs. There was white powder, and discolored insulation surrounding the cracked insulation. Also, one of the bus joints that was inspected was very loose, and also showed signs of overheating. I realize the risk, and would very much like to stay out of this gear, but it might need more attention. I think the general consensus is to repot the bottles still in place.

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

Why don't you just replace the bottles?

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
Cost would be too high, and would also require disassembly of the switchgear.

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
Finally heard back from GE. They recommend using 3M epoxy and 3M 130 splicing tape instead of the original potting compound. The hard part will be figuring out how to clean out the old compound in the event we find a problem. As far as I know, removing them would require disassembling the main bus, and this is not something we are interested in doing.

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

droid...

Doesn't sound like you have a lot of choice.  If you don't do something, the bus will eventually disassemble itself.

old field guy

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

Thedroid, just in case, I stock spare magneblast cubuicles and breakers, you know, just in case :)

Do you know specifically which bottles have PD?

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
No, but the two compartments that were inspected both had issues with the potting pulling away from the bars. Two of the bolts holding the bus joints together were also very loose. We plan on removing the joint covers, torquing down the bolts, and wrapping them with 130 tape. If any of the bottles look suspect, then we will have to decide what to do from there.

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
We intend to go through with the repair here in a few weeks. We are going remove the old cotton/varnish from the bolted joints, clean, retorque, and recover with raychem HV tubing and sheets. Any of the potting compound that looks pulled away or deteriorated will be replaced with 3M Scotchcast 4 epoxy resin. Does anybody have any other suggestions?

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

Consider that you will never be able to remove epoxy in future if you ever needed to, at least not without destroying the equipment.
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

As I read your post your planning on re-sleeving the bus with Raychem heat shrink tubing, and using Raychem heat shrink tape on the standard joints. This should work well. I hope your also purchased a couple of Raychems torches to do the shrinking. If the bus supports between cells are porceline insure your newly sleeved bus actually fits through it before you go to the trouble of taking the all the bus out.  Pre heat the bus bars (hot enough to blister the skin) prior to installing and shrinking the sleeving sleeving.  A roofers torch is perfect for that task (but a bit much for the sleeving).

I am not sure I would go to the trouble of re-potting the bottles on 5kV switchgear.  Maybe I would pour new compound in the cracks or spaces at best.  But we covered all that in earlier posts.

I hope you have small techs with long arms on hand for this project.  Please keep us posted and good luck.   

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

I recommend you do a corona scan and PD survey right after start up to check your work and establish baseline data.  

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
We did order the torch from Raychem. I considered the cons of using the epoxy, but I don't want to have to deal with having to heat up the pine resin and pour it.

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

If you are removing bus and putting on heat shrink sleeving, be careful handling the hot finished product.  Don't rush re-installing the sleeved pcs.  They will continue to shrink until cool.  A small tear when installing hot will result in severely damaged sleeving as it will continue to tear while it shrinks. Remember to pre heat the bus (if sleeving). It makes all the difference. Wrapping the joints with Raychem tape then heating would work perfect.  I have never used the sheets.   

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

Maybe it is a retrofit Magneblast, the originals had no vacuum bottles. Get a new retrofit or better still replace them with new switchgear and gain a lot of space if two high. This technolgy replaced old filled breakers in the 60S.   

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
Definately not a retrofit. No vacuum bottles either. I was refering to the porcelain insulators containing the primary disconnects. I guess the look like "bottles". We recieved the Raychem HVIS for the bolted joints, and also their HV heat shrink tape for the bars themselves. The torch they supplied looks pretty nice. I'll test it tommorow. We're still waiting on the 3M scotchcast resin, but it should be in soon. A skinny tech with long arms would definately be a plus. The plan is to try and do most of the work with the breaker in place, that way we don't lose the alignment. It seems like a daunting job, but hopefully it will keep a few of us in the Electrical dept. working, while most of the plant is on furlough.

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

This seems like a third world solution, patching up 40 year old magnetic air circuit breakers. Get a new circuit breaker, your modifications are not tested or certified and could result in an accident.    

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

He is repairing the switchgear, not the breakers. I asked that question back in July.  

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

(OP)
I don't see why it would be considered 3rd world. We don't have the luxury of ordering a whole new switchgear, and I think that inspecting and trying to repair is better than doing nothing. 3rd world would be filling it with roofing tar, and wrapping it with 33. How would you fix this problem, if replacement wasn't an option?

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

I would get the GE service group to do it or retrofit to vacuum.. I have to wonder how your company can stay in business if they have do self repair on 40 year old switchear. Seems some kind of QA/QC, safety rewiew is needed. would hate to be standing next to it when energised. I have seem some nasty results in the past.  

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

xxjohnh,

Read the original posts. He is just trying to fix his existing switchgear. What he is doing is done all the time. He wants to do it right and deserves credit for trying to do so. Thats why he posted here in the first place. Many of my clients have 40 year old (some older) switchgear and would rather have it then what is available today regardless of price. It is their choice after all.

It's easy to recommend replacing something with new when its not your money. Even I can do that.
 

RE: Re potting Magneblast breaker bottles

They sure don't make them like they used to, thats for sure. Those magneblasts were the worst thing GE ever built of you ask thier accountants, dang things have lasted 50 years (or more) and could last 50 more.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources