×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Ineffective soil at the top of piles

Ineffective soil at the top of piles

Ineffective soil at the top of piles

(OP)
I need to settle a little debate with my boss.  Here's the situation:

Normally, the soils reports that we get from our geotechs instructs us to ignore the top 2 meters or so of the pile length when calculating skin friction and lateral load resistance.

By boss says that that the 2 meters is from the top of the pile cap, not the top of the pile itself.  He is assuming that the issue is frost disturbance to the soil.  Therefore the two meters is measured from the soil surface surrounding the pile/cap assembly.

I was under the impression that the two meters should be taken from the top of the pile which, in this case, is the bottom of the pile cap.  I thought that it was all about the soil near the top of the pile being disturbed by construction activities associated with constructing the piles.

So, who's right here?  For what it's worth, these are cast in place concrete piles.

RE: Ineffective soil at the top of piles

The particular interpretation should be asked to those making the recommendations, for it might mean either.

Anyway, any of you, if you don't see mandatory clause and clear one in the applicable code, and not precision is coming from the geotechs, you are left with the technical books recommendations, that may also vary given the different backgrounds, what is sound because there are different situations and what is good somewhere is not at another place, and helps to understand what when.

I could look at some of these books and would be such thing, just a particular case advice even from one accepted source.

RE: Ineffective soil at the top of piles

Kootenay, I agree with you.  
When I did soil capacity calculations for piles, I was taught to ignore the top 5 feet of soil to account for construction disturbance, future excavations, etc.
It shouldn't affect your calculations much.  If your pile is failing without the extra soil and passing with it, I think you're cutting it too close anyway.  
It's dirt, which is a pretty variable material even in the best conditions.

RE: Ineffective soil at the top of piles

KK,

See the FHWA references for the rationale for drilled shafts. Usually, I don't see this applied to driven piles unless the soil conditions near surface are obviously bad...

Jeff
 

RE: Ineffective soil at the top of piles

(OP)
Jeff,

Could you point me to a specific FHWA reference?  I mulled around their website but didn't get too far.

KK

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources