×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings
3

Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

(OP)
Do you require Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings/Shop drawings for every job?  If not, when do you make the requirement necessary.   

I have a contractor saying he never has had to submit these.  Even though this is a relatively simple building concrete wise, we have a number of embeds on the project and required them.    I told him he needed to submit them because they were required as part of the specs and drawings, but now he is going to the Owner and Arch saying we are adding un-neccesary costs to the job.

What are your typical practices?   

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

2
Tell the Owner and Architect that they have added an unnecessary contractor to the job.  

This requirement as the project structural engineer is your call, and yours alone.  If the requirement is listed in the job specifications, then this is not an extra.  Tell the Architect and Owner that this is not an extra and the contractor is just whining because he missed it in the bid.  Make him fulfill the contract, and really peruse all requests for payment from this point forward.  This guy obviously bid low to get the job, hoping to make the difference on extras.  Give him no quarter here.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

I like the way you think Mike.  

When in doubt, just take the next small step.
 

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Thanks for the star - just doing my job.  smile

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Check his math and re-measure his "as-placed" positions on those embeds very, very carefully.

If he is low-balling/irritated at the work and contract conditions, underneath poured concrete is a GOOD place to hide all of your frustrations.    

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

And, under the circumstnces, if YOU cannot physically verify it, it being anything beyond this point, then the rule is to tear it out and do it again - at HIS cost and to YOUR satisfaction as the owner's representative.

Man, but I'm bitchy tonight!

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

I worked on a not-to-be-named Caribbean island where the common argument was "we've never had to submit them on anything before" in conjunction with "aren't all the bars are on your drawings, right?" Even the architects tried to convince us they weren't needed. Sometimes we gave in, but on a particularly complicated one we pushed and ended up getting "shop drawings" either hand-drawn or marked up in red pen on blowups of our plans. It wasn't exactly what we expected but it did the job.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

If it's not included in the specifications, included in the drawing notes, or listed in a referenced code of practice, it is likely an extra to contract. Best to review the specs and the drawings prior to giving an answer.

Dik

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

I assume this is in the US, and these were always required when I practiced there.  In Australia where I now live, reinforcing shop drawings are unheard of.  It always amazes me that they get the bars correct, or at least mostly so, by just using bar lists and the structural engineer's drawings.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Hokie,
Just for info, I have been specing/getting shop drawings provided for my transfer slabs and columns in Australia. No complains yet, because Genrally the major steel suppliers do shop drawings, just engineers don't want to see them.  

When in doubt, just take the next small step.
 

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Interesting- In my part of the world I have never heard of shop drawings for rebar. What more info can you get off these than off a proper detailing drawing with a bar bending schedule? I have often wondered why we ask steel fabricators to do shop drawings with all the details on but not concrete contractors.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

(OP)
I appreciate the comments on how to deal with the contractor, but my question was whether everyone usually requires these, or at what level these are normally done?

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

It's a judgement call but for me on simple projects with only soil supported footings and/or walls I don't require rebar shop drawings. But for any raised cast-in-place I do require.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Simple projects like all straight bars, minimal corner bars for footings, frost walls, slab on grade, etc. no shop drawings.

Structural columns, beams, structural slabs, mats, pile caps, caissons, etc require shop drawings.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

I agree with phuduhudu that for most jobs a structural engineer's drawing with a bending schedule is all that is required. So generally this would cover pile caps, beams, columns, slabs.

But there will be cases where the contractor has some cast in items which are his selection and sizing. This may include prestressing detailing where the contractor would then have to do shop drawings for the rebar to show how everything fits together. Other cases would be where the contractor's working method may require additional detail to the rebar, e.g making a space to fit a tremie tube through.

I have also come across structural engineer's drawings without bending schedules where it isn't possible for the guy's on site to identify the shape or exact location of the bars. In this case I think it is laziness on the part of the structural engineer, not a need for shop drawings.

 

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

I have required and reviewed many shop drawings of rebar.  As was said, it depends on the complexity of the design if you think you NEED it.  If its a simple foundation, then probably not.  But there is always something to be said for reviewing the rebar drawings anyways to make sure that there were no oversights by the rebar supplier (which can happen quite easily - even basic rebar can be pretty complicated).  Usually I will do some spot checks to make sure that they have calculated the proper embedment depths, hook lengths, etc...  If that stuff looks good, then you tend to get that warm cozy feeling that you're in good hands.

NEVER trust anyone who says they've "never had to submit this before" or "the have never had to do it like this before".  This is a very common tactic.  And an annoying one I might add.

If it's black and white in the spec, nail them (or use it as leverage against other possible extras).

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

I believe the contractor should do shop drawings for his own protection, because when you to observe the slab reinforcement before the concrete pouring operation and there is something wrong, then he has to fix everything before he is allowed to pour the concrete. This usually will end up costing him more money than simply installing the rebars using a shop drawing.

I have done work all over the world and here is the key points.

1) Design Build Projects can go from the Design Development stage to shop drawings with out going to a final design phase. in other words the design engineer will prepare all the bar placement and bending schedules for the contractor to build. Till today there are some countries where the contractor will bend all the bars in the field and not in a steel fabricator shop.

2) Design and then Build Projects has to go though final design phase before the bidding process starts. The final design phase may not include bar bending and placement schedules in which case the contractor has to provide (again for his own protection, otherwise he is an inexperienced contractor). There are cases where the owner asks for the shop drawings to be included in the final design phase in which case the contractor does not have to prepare shop drawings.

In all cases the bar bending and placement should be done not because it is a requirement but because it is a necessity to save money for the contractor and owner.

The contractor may take the risk if the owner allows it at the same time he has to take the responsibilty of fixing everything that is wrong before pouring any concrete. This usually will end up costing him much much more than a stupid shop drawing.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

phuduhudu, Zambo

Bending schedules in the countries where I have worked are never prepared by the structural engineer on building projects.  There was a time when they were, maybe 50 years ago, but not now.  It is not a matter of laziness, but rather a matter of who is in the best position to prepare the bending schedules, and who is being paid to do it.  In my opinion, the supplier of the reinforcing (or his designated detailer) is the appropriate party.  Bar bending schedules prepared by the structural engineer and included with the tender documents would in today's environment be useless due to the propensity of architects to change things during construction.     

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

hokie66,

here in the UK they still do bending schedules but no steel connections. Seems to me it should be the other way around.

strguy11,

Give them the option. Either they submit the reinforcing drawings to you or they pay you to come out and inspect what they have done. This makes you look helpful and flexible but we really know which option he is going to choose.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

There's more to a shop drawing than just placement details.  The primary purpose of the shop drawing is to reflect the contractor's understanding of the structural engineer's intent.  If there's a disconnect, it will show in the shop drawing...that's why the structural engineer reviews them.

The system is a good "check and balance".

Yes, the structural engineer could provide all the details necessary for the construction. That will increase the engineer's fee (or it should!).  While there are some positive aspects for doing it this way, the more common method in the US is to have the fabricator reflect the design, giving HIS most expedient way of doing the job...not the engineer's shot at directing the fabricator.

Agree completely with Mike.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Subject to my comments, Ron and Mike are correct.

Dik

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

This discussion as highlighted by csd72 shows that different countries have different ways of working.

If you look at a UK structural engineers rebar drawing alongside his bending schedule it is very clear. The shape and location of each bar is known and it isn't possible to misunderstand where the bars should go or the intent of the designer.

The advantage is that both engineer and contractor know the basis of the design. Then both can look for any clashes with built in items or any differences between the structural drawings and the architectural drawings.

I haven't worked in the UK for 20 years but I find UK rebar detailing practices alive and well in several countries.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

strguy11,

What type of embeds are you concerned about?

Is it the location(s) that you are concerned about or that the assembly is correctly placed or fabricated?

Are they required for other trades such as the ironworker or the curtainwall contractor to complete his/her work?  If so than the GC should be coordinating this with his subcontractors.

From what I understand ACI 318 and the model building codes don't explicitly require "Placing Drawings".  If required as part of the "Contract Documents" (i.e., Drawings and Specifications) then you should have explicitly stated that the reinforcing details shall comply with ACI 315 & ACI 315R which are part of ACI Detailing Manual (SP-66).  The embeds that you are concerned about should also have been specifically noted on the "Contract Documents" since it may not be the Detailers Responsiblity based on ACI 315 and 315R.  Also ACI 315/315R states that the only dimensions required by the Detailer are what is required to place the bars, they do not have to show any other dimensions of the structure as these should be shown on the engineering drawings.

Based on the ACI Detailing manual it is understood that for Highway Type Projects the Placing Details are typically done by the Engineer and on Building Type Projects the Placing Details are typically done by the Fabricator.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

I am interested to see how these things are done in the US then. How do you convey the design intent to the fabricator? Do you tell them what no. of bars you need in the tops and bottoms of beams and then leave the detailing to him?

As others have said, if we do it for steel connections then why not for rebar as well? Makes sense to me and as others say there is a lot of extra work in doing the detailing yourself.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

It should be understood that having placing drawings and details done by the fabricator does not relieve the engineer of providing details and relavent information.

The engineer must show sizes of structural members, required cover, number and/or spacing of bars, number and/or spacing of stirrups, hook requirements, lap requirements, etc. on some kind of prescriptive details.

The detailer/fabricator will then based on the prescriptive requirements figure the actual bar lengths and bending details.  Engineer may say #6 Top bars at 12" o.c. with hooked ends.  The detailer/Fabricator will then check lap lengths provided by Engineer and Hook Requirements and what bars lengths he has in stock.  And will say 10#6 x 28'-6" @ 12" o.c. Top Bars + MK6A01 ea. end.  MK6A01 may be looked up on the bending schedule which shows a hooked bar with exact length and hook length.

I think the purpose is that the fabricator and placer knows what lengths of stock he can easily handle, or has on hand, etc.  And can decide how he wants to maximize efficency in the field or the shop.  The engineer is mearly giving the guidelines or requirements not the actual lengths ea. member should be and not exact quantities of bars to be placed.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

(OP)
MaddEngineer:

The embeds are for structural steel support.  The embeds are just a plate with anchor bolts, with a shear tab for steel connecton, and typical beam bearing plates for beams bearing on concrete, and diaphragm shear transfer plates.   

These were detailed and shown on the drawings.  However, sometimes not, I find these installed at the wrong elevations, even though we show what they should be at.

This is kind of why I ask for the drawings, to show that the contractor is doing his coordination between disciplines, and that he understands the drawing intent.  Sometimes these embed are omitted from the drawings, even though our specs and drawings require all embeds to be shown on these drawings.   This is why we have always been requesting these, so that we know the contractor knows they are required.  

We do require that all the bar bends, details, etc comply with ACI, so I think we are ok technically.  

Thanks for your input.   

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Strguy11,

From my experience those items typically are the responsibility of the steel contractor via the GC.  The steel shop drawings should show the exact placement of the items along with top of steel elevations.  The steel contractor typically will also provide (plywood or steel) templates for placing the anchor bolts.  This is all up to the GC to enforce or coordinate... I don't know if you should start trying to take responsibility for them (I know you are trying to be proactive which is why I keep contemplating design-build myself), but, it might make sense to state GC shall coordinate location and placing of embeds with steel and concrete contractor.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Strguy11,

Have steel shop drawings been submitted yet?  If yes then I would place the GC note on the drawings.  If not then they are taking a little bit of a risk.  This is why a lot of guys like using post-installed anchors, then the steel guy does not have to rely on the concrete guy and his anchor bolts won't be all banged up by the time he gets to the site.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Let me preface this by saying that my name is a misnomer as I have been doing this for over 35+ years.

My 2 cents.  Any "Building Contractor" would not have a problem with providing shop drawings or the expectation to do so.  A "Highway Contractor" might.

My first attempt at State work was for a pedestrian tunnel under a State Highway in a mid-size city.  I designed and detailed it as I had done numerous tunnels for industrial clients.  All of which had been successfully built after the review of shop drawings.

The State had us redo the drawings with the addition of bar bend schedules, etc., so the contractor would know exactly what to bid and what to build.  There would be no shop drawings to review as the fabricator would provide the material directly from our design drawing.

Maybe in this tight economy, a contractor has ventured into new territory.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

(OP)
I agree that they are usually supplied by the steel guy, but I think they are actually installed by the concrete guy.  I have not recieved steel shop drawings yet, so there is nothing that I have that shows that the GC understands the requirements. (Another reason I usually require them)   

As a side note, we have all of the notes you discussed on our plans, and our shop drawing review stamp indicates that our review does not relieve the contractor of his responsiblity of complying with the contract documents, so i dont see that I am taking on any extra liability.

 

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

A bit of a tangent here, but as a "highway contractor", I get simultaneously amused and scared whenever I see rebar represented on a drawing (for any job) as a thin line.

Rebar has real-world thickness and should be shown to scale (as appropriate) on detailing drawings, as this will help prevent as-built conflicts between bars shown as occupying the same space, show areas where cover will not be maintained, and indicate areas where it will be difficult for the concrete to flow and possibly create a void.

Also remember that cover needs to apply to the shear steel, and that the logitudinal bars will usually be placed deeper within the section as they are tied to the shear steel supports.

How many times have you seen a requirement for cover, and a dimension from the outside edge of the member to the center of the bar that was exactly the cover depth? Will it be tied and poured that way? Maybe...

Jeff
 

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

strguy11,

I'm not trying to scare you or anything I would probably be doing the same thing you are doing, but just remember to look ahead and make sure whatever actions you take (writing or for that matter not writing something on the drawings, etc.) are not going to add undue risk to you or your organization.  Like they say everything is okay until its not okay and then everyone starts pointing fingers.

For instance your Shop Drawing Stamp probably says something like Reviewed for Impact on Structure Only, etc., etc.  Now if the dimensions of the embedments are noted on the drawings and they are wrong and you said nothing it could be construed that you reviewed them and since they do have an impact on the structure you may have some liability issues. Now suppose you corrected them and the contractor took note of them and it turns out the corrected dimensions are wrong and nobody else picked up on it, again you have some liability issues.

In each case most of the time on most projects things are handled as they say "Like Gentlemen" however, when something goes wrong its everyman (or woman) for themselves.

Since it appears that you have a little bit of a "rogue" or a "cowboy" contractor it is best to look ahead and Cover Your A$$.

Now if you let them get away with not providing the shop drawings or info requested in the Contact Documents you may also have some liability issues since you did not enforce the contract and may have not exercised your due diligence to the owner.  In that case I would issue some kind of memo stating that the drawings are a required part of the contract and by not providing them the contractor is proceeding at his own risk and the owner should determine if they wish to enforce that part of the contract.

I'm not a lawyer, however, but I have worked for a GC/CM, a large Subcontractor, as well as Design Firms and have learned a little from each and now I work for myself (in theory at least, you still work for someone which is your clients) and I have also never been in a bad situation (luckily), but, what I learned from the GC/CM end is to be careful with documentation (or lack of) and how you state things in correspondence can be construed should things go awry.

Good Luck...

Also I have done my fair share of Steel Shop and Rebar Placing Drawings and They can be a pain in the a$$, but, I would recommend every engineer to do a few it makes you a better engineer.  I wish I could say the same for some contractors (that is they should do some engineering it might make them better contractors or maybe just give them a headache).

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

This seems very different from a UK type system.

In this case there seems to be a GC who has some coordination role for other contractors, specifically a structural steelwork contractor. In the UK in most cases the steelwork contractor would be employed by the GC and he would manage, not coordinate, the various disciplines.

Assuming these embedded items are not huge they should fit into the rebar with allowable amounts of bar movement, this is the GC's responsibility. Not sure why he needs to make a drawing for this.

In other cases such as a prestressing system there may be an element of design and build, in this case the contractor would usually have to make shop drawings for the rebar.

Again it just shows differences in the way the industry runs in different countries. In the UK a structural engineer would be surprised to be told that the contractor better knows the legths of rebar available. The answer's 12m lengths.  

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

(OP)
I appreciate your comments, and yes our stamp does say that they are "reviewed" for general conformance only, and that our review does not relieve the contractor for his responsibility of complying with the shops.   

I liken it to Steel shop drawings.  Do you check every single dimension on the steel piece drawings??  My guess is that you dont, and only check the overall dimensions (grid lines, top of steel elevs, and don't review the actual shop dimensions (setbacks, etc) because the contractor is still responsible for fit up.   Same way here on the elevations of the embeds, he is still responsible, even if he showed them.  I am just trying to head things off before the become an issue, but the contractor is still responsible.  Remember, they have reviewed them as well before we get them, right?

I do agree, that if I correct an actual elevation and it is wrong, then I do have some liability.  

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

For those of us who have reviewed shop drawings and seen that they rarely get them correct the first time, and therefore don't fully understand the design requirements, know the value of requiring them.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Just to add another thought, if something goes wrong and you were the one to not require shop drawings to show that the contractor understood your design intent, you might expect to share the blame.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Even with reinforcing shop drawings, you wouldn't use them to check the reinforcing on site.  You would use your design drawings, at which time any deficiencies should be found and corrected.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

I have always required (and received) rebar shop drawings for my work in upper midwest USA.  StructuralEd and Ron have already said what I would have said...

And I couldn't agree more with DRW75's comment:  
[NEVER trust anyone who says they've "never had to submit this before" or "the have never had to do it like this before".  This is a very common tactic.  And an annoying one I might add.]
In my experience, those two quotes are usually preceded with the phrase, "I've been doin' this for 30 years, and I've..."


Related story: (I'm sure most of you have similar stories)
I went to look at Contractor's progress on a metal deck roof, and noticed that there were no sidelap screws where we had specified them (and where they were clearly shown on metal deck submittal).  I pointed this out to Contractor, who said, "Oh those?  We've ~never~ had to put ~those~ in before..."

Right...

Good contractors don't say stuff like that - sadly there are some bad ones who do.

RE: Concrete Rebar Placement Drawings

Since this thread seems to be sparking quite a bit of interest I thought I should look at my handy dandy A/E Liability Law Book and see what it says concerning Shop Drawings, it was pretty interesting...

1. The courts treat shop drawings as an expression of the design

2. If the A/E reviews and approves an erroneous shop drawing it can be construed as an interpretation of the intent of the contract documents

3. The term "consistency with design intent" has been construed by some courts as an ambiguous and meaningless statement

4. It noted one case where a contractor took field measurements, prepared shop drawings, submitted the drawings for review and secured approval.  It was discovered during erection that the elevations in the approved drawings were inaccurate.  A claim was submitted for costs expended in correcting the installation.  It was claimed that it was industry practice to rely on shop drawing submittals approved by the engineer.  The claim was rejected, but, only because the design documents did not have elevations noted so it was understood that the contractor had sole responsibility to verify them.

5. It also states some ways to reduce risk and liability: 1.) the contract should clearly state the shop drawing submittal and review process, 2.) that the shop drawings are not an extension of the design documents and are not a vehicle for communication between the A/E and the Contractor, 3.) and how changes and substitutions to the design shall be submitted.  It is noted that this is part of the standard AIA and EJCDC (Engineers' Joint Constract Documents Committee) contracts.

6. Also items not specified for shop drawing submittal should be returned not reviewed.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources