INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Plastic shear resistance of steel pipes

Plastic shear resistance of steel pipes

(OP)
Any reference on how to derive the plastic shear resistance of a steel pipe given by the expression'
 Vp = 4rt(Fy/sqrt(3))where Fy/sqrt(3)is the Von Mises yield criterion

RE: Plastic shear resistance of steel pipes

It is just the useful component of the differential area following the shear axis along the circumference, each semicircumference gives Dt=2rt, hence for all 4rt by the shear strength.  

RE: Plastic shear resistance of steel pipes

(OP)
But my calculation indicates (pi)rt(Fy/sqrt(3)), that is,
3.14rt(Fy/sqrt(3)), not 4rt(Fy/sqrt(3))

Why I'm geting this difference? 3.14 instead of 4?

RE: Plastic shear resistance of steel pipes

because you are having some error in the setup of your equation.

for half circumference on positive y halfspace

alfa(x)=acos((r-x)/r)

useful component of the area (its component along shear, here along x)

= t·integral between 0 and 2r of

( r·sin(alfa(x))· (d(alfa(x)/dx)· dx)

= 2rt

twice that 4rt

 

RE: Plastic shear resistance of steel pipes

Other thing is that the AISC is the sole interpretation of the correct evaluation of the capacity in shear of the pipes. I think it is a smart evaluation because it acknowledges efficience to shear at midheight of the pipe section where the curve deviates less from the shear action, leaving free atop and bottom (by not counting the contribution to resist shear action of the pipe elements) to engage the tensile and compressive forces deriving from moment action.

So for a flexure setup looks quite adequate. For beamcolumn maybe the concurrence of compressive or tensile forces at the center of the section should be studied in interaction. Not looking any code, just thinking.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close