×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

How can you model this part in NX5?
6

How can you model this part in NX5?

How can you model this part in NX5?

(OP)
A general question here, I'm having a hard time working out how to set up a sweep to get a part like the one attached below.
Any advice greatly appreciated.

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

I would take a look at it but I cannot open your file.

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

(OP)
Hi Speedster sorry you can't see the file. Maybe you can look at the file attached by JohnVincent he has the file I sent in the .prt file.

Hi JohnVincent thanks for the pointers I'll play around wth the project curve command to see what I can get. At least I know where to begin now...
 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

2
RobLN,

Have a look at the attached because there is more to be understood about such examples than may at first meet the eye.

I suspect that what is really involved is that the groove would be cut using an end mill on the 4th axis of a machining centre. It creates a geometry for which the perfect swept solid path is difficult to define. My first example more or less arrives at a construction method attempting to duplicate that kind of geometry. It looks rough and more like the original. The second example is more or less like what I think John has modelled in NX-6.

Delete the Move Face at the end to overlay the two. Sorry if the features are a bit of a mash it really isn't such a complex design anyway. In all likelihood you may wish to differently constrain the wrapped sketches. I didn't bother since it wasn't necessary to prove the method.

Best Regards

Hudson

www.jamb.com.au

Nil Desperandum illegitimi non carborundum

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

(OP)
Hi John & Hudson,

Thanks very much for the support on the model side. that really gives me some ideas.

Sorry John, but I can't open the NX6 rev file. Would it be possible to convert to NX5 please?
I would like to take a look.
 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

RobLN The second version in my file was exactly the same method as John's except that he may have constrained the sketch properly and really that part IS up to you.

Best Regards

Hudson

www.jamb.com.au

Nil Desperandum illegitimi non carborundum

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

(OP)
Hi Mmauldin - thanks for your input. I've learnt a great deal form looking through the history tree. Thanks for taking the time.

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

RobLN,

What version are you currently running? I've got another idea that I'm going to try out which might be closer yet to what is desired, but I want to make sure that you can see the final model.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

(OP)
Hi John I'm running NX 5.0.4.1 (on windows XP)

Look forward to seeing what you come up with!

 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

What's really needed here is the ability to sweep a solid, i.e. a cylinder that would represent an end mill, along a set of guides.  This would be very helpful in constructing a model that accurately depicts the result of milling a spiral slot.  I have had other instances where creating a model by driving a tool along a tool path would have made my life much easier.  Future enhancement, maybe?

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

RobLN,

One other question, are you working in Metric or Imperial units?

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

OK, assuming that you're working in Metric, the part attached to this post is an NX 5.0 version of what I modeled the first time in NX 6.0, but I don't think it quite does what you want although it comes very close and it's very well behaved and it only took 9 features (not counting the Datum CSYS).

However, in my next post I'll include a slight variation which I suspect is what you're actually looking for.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

Now this is my second try, which I suspect will be much closer to what you're looking for, however this model required 12 features (not counting the Datum CSYS).

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

I am not an UGNX user but try to follow the way I would model it In I-deas. (Maybe you can model something simliar in UGNX.  First I would create surface that follows the centerline of the cutter. (OK I-Deas Command here do a surface Offset) of that surface and do not keep the orignal.
Model the same surface and do a surface offset of that surface to the other side opposite of the first surface you made. The surface offset equals your cutter radius.  Cut the ends off with an extrude where you want your tangent of the cutter to end up at.  Make a flat surface at the ends you have cut.  Do a (I do not know if UGNX has this I-Deas has all of the perfect commands LOL) Three Surface Fillet between the three surfaces.  Now you have the geometry you need.  

 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

There are now so many possible results to this problem that you probably have to ask yourself which could be right.

I have attached the little assembly that I have created to illustrate a few of the earlier examples as compared with what I have found later on.

Mike Mauldin is right in saying that a swept cutter is difficult to duplicate. The thing that he's probably not going to believe is that the swept method he used produces nothing like the correct result. I have subtracted a series of tubes from the solid body to approximate an actual cutter path assuming that the machining method is indeed a 4th axis milling process. I think we can safely stick with this because the original geometry bears it out.

The closest results to the actual sides of the slot were obtained using examples which created a law extension sheet, thickened it and then subtracted. The bottom however wasn't very close at all.

In the latest example number 3 I have used the law extension surface and some wrapped curves to sweep a section using no less that three guides AND a spine curve to control the shape. This is interesting because although some of the surfaces are still quite rough in a few places there is a close match between both the original step data and the section of pseudo cutter path.

I don't know if anybody is really going to take this much interest in the question but it is interesting for me because in an earlier version we attempted the same thing and found ourselves stumped by such an example. I think this time we're a little closer if anything.

Best Regards

Hudson

www.jamb.com.au

Nil Desperandum illegitimi non carborundum

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

"The thing that he's probably not going to believe is that the swept method he used produces nothing like the correct result."

I have no problem at all believing this because I have been down this path many times before.   For creating a general depiction of the part this doesn't pose much of a problem. As for drafting, I use curves to describe the center of the slot along with a depth/width callout.  The biggest problem I run into is when our manufacturing group tries to use the model with a CMM to verify the part.  That is why I would really like to have a way to sweep a solid along a guide.

"The closest results to the actual sides of the slot were obtained using examples which created a law extension sheet, thickened it and then subtracted."

Granted, but using a cylinder to create the end condition gives a much more accurate result for that portion of the feature.  Perhaps a hybrid approach would be the best overall solution.


 

 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

... oh I like this thread...
I 've looked at ervery solution. Here's my . Ok it differs from the orginal - just an other way is the idea - I did my design in Nx6 - And additional have a question to the experts.
As you can see I designed a tool. I should not intersect - but it does- where is my mistake?
thx in ad

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

OK, look at the attached file.  I took your model and right near where your swept body transitioned from the line to the spline, I created a series of cross-section curves which will help you see how as the sweep made this transition the 'profile' of the sweep starts to twist ever so slightly as your guide curve also starts to twist.  To see this better, open the model and without changing the display scale, slowly rotate the image about the Z-Axis from left to right (anti-clockwise) and watch the area in the vicinity of the lower part of front face of the Red cutter.

It's just the nature of the beast which is why it's so hard to model exactly what the volume of space that a rotating body moving along what in this case would be a 4-Axis cutting path (the cylindrical part would rotate while the cutter moved in a linear direction parallel to the axis of the cylindrical part with the axis of the tool normal to the axis of the cylindrical part).

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

thank you John on your reply,
I there a better way to model such a cutter path?
thx in ad

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

(OP)
Thanks for all your feedback guys, pleased to see that my part has sparked some imaginative ways of solving the component model. I've got to just sit down and work some of it out in detail now... I've got an even more complex head style to model next week.  

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

RobLN,

Are you actually manufacturing these items or are they just being modeled so that your 'pictures' look correct?

I mean these things remind me of quick-release fasteners from someone like Camloc...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=x6vt5XhBgFw

...or ZLoc...



 

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: How can you model this part in NX5?

(OP)
Hi John

I work for an international fastener company and we do manufacture those kind of parts here in the UK similar to the ZLoc item above. All new designs need to be modeled in NX now rather than the incumbent CAD software at that site (Pro-E I think...)

Some are machined and some are rolled but all of them need to be modeled correctly. Appreciate all your advice with the modelling Thank you.

Rob.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources