×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Unreinforced Masonry Structures

Unreinforced Masonry Structures

Unreinforced Masonry Structures

(OP)
I am trying to figure out if unreinforced masonry stuctures in the IBC 2006/ACI 530-05 require minimum reinforcing steel no matter what.

I used to work in CA and we reinforced everything bearing and non-bearing walls. Now I work in a non-seismic area and there is this grey area between contractors and designers. I don't have access to the ACI code now.

Thank you,

  

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Structures

No, unreinforced masonry doesn't require minimum reinforcing.   

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Structures

It is not required, but there are places where some steel may be used, but it is not structural.

The miscellaneous uses would be bent flat plates to anchor intersecting walls where the normal bond of the walls is not sufficient ("other than running bond"), to tie separate wythes together to get composite action (greater d) and for joint reinforcement (Dur-O-Wal, etc.) for crack control and continuity.

Take a look at the ACI 530 section on Empirical Design.

Just keep in mind that you generally design masonry using the wall as a structural element and not the minute, "nit-picking" concept of looking at the block and mortar as separate structural elements.

Also avoid arbitrarily fill all the cores of concrete masonry, since you could be creating problems.

Dick

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Structures

"Also avoid arbitrarilly fill all the cores of concrete masonry, since you could be creating problems."

But you will usually solve more problems than you create.

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Structures

Im doing a job right at this moment where Im doing 8" concrete blocks and insisted that all cores be filled.  Why

 "Also avoid arbitrarilly fill all the cores of concrete masonry, since you could be creating problems"  ?

Although my walls have lots of reo (Im trying to achieve a concrete panel strength since I cannot erect concrete panels here !)



 

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Structures

civeng,

That's a funny idea they have in the US.  I suggest you ignore it, and just keep on working in accordance with Australian practice.

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Structures

Two problems I can think of due to filling all cores are additional cost and additional weight, are there any others?

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Structures

A CMU wall should also be designed laterally to resist its own weight from appropriate seismic forces.  If the wall is marginally reinforced for that, adding additional infill material could structurally compromise the wall in a seismic event - increasing the weight by as much as 50% - and the required seismic reinforcing.   

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Structures

Thanks Mike.
A good reminder for those of us who don't practise within a seismic zone.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources