×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Surcharge and Soil Safety Factors, Retaining Wall.

Surcharge and Soil Safety Factors, Retaining Wall.

Surcharge and Soil Safety Factors, Retaining Wall.

(OP)
I am design a soil retaining wall with 3 rows of tiebacks.  I have a surcharge on the top of the wall of 95 KPa (2000 lb/ft2).  This is load is from a water storage tank. Should i be factoring my surcharge load by 1.5? Also, should I be factoring my soil loads by 1.25?

RE: Surcharge and Soil Safety Factors, Retaining Wall.

Hmmm, the rationale for factoring live loads and dead loads remains in place whatever their nature. So except the code makes explicit exception, the ordinary safety factors should be employed.

As an example; floors made of just a plate of concrete, here, Spain. Everyone knows that with proper caution on not exceeding the thickness, the load rarely will exceed the normative value. Yet anyway a on dead load safety factor of 1.35 must be used factoring the loads.

Now, a structural code is a system of getting in reliable way  a targeted level of safety, and any works on the scope of one should be following its clauses.

There is another important aspect of codes, comparing them and their practical effects, tu pursue betterment of construction.

Separate clauses use also to be used where no extant enforceable information is standing, always caring of the way of application and the intent, being then basically another source of technical information explicitly sanctioned by some government or technical body.

RE: Surcharge and Soil Safety Factors, Retaining Wall.

Refer to the AASHTO LRFD 2007 Bridge Design Specs. It provides a chart with specific load factors for specific load types. Chapter 11 is specific to MSE walls.

RE: Surcharge and Soil Safety Factors, Retaining Wall.

I would present the unfactored loads to the structural engineer and let them properly design the structure using the safety factors required for the structure (and the codes).

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

RE: Surcharge and Soil Safety Factors, Retaining Wall.

The code I use (AS1170) allows a factor reduction from 1.5 to 1.2 if 'the liquid type and density is well defined and design liquid height cannot be exceeded'.

RE: Surcharge and Soil Safety Factors, Retaining Wall.

Jay17,

Use factored or unfactored loads as required by the code you are using and the calculation methodology for the resistances.

Do not mix factored and unfactored loads!

Jeff

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources