×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

MV Protection Trip

MV Protection Trip

MV Protection Trip

(OP)
A 33kV feeder of ours connects to a remote substation B with a single 33/11kV Dyn11 transformer connected at B, and an 11kV distribution board at B. The relay on the 33kV feede CB at Substation A has Overcurrent & Earth Fault protection. There was a phase to phase fault and the 11kV CB at substation B opened on OC prot. About 2 ms AFTER the correct opening of the 11kV CB at sub B, the 33kV feeder at sub A tripped on 33kV earth fault prot, which we find strange. The 11kV feeder which faulted runs for about 2 miles on conjoint poles carying the incoming 33kV supply with the 11kV underbuilt bu about 2.5 metres. Any ideas as to why this may have happenned?  

RE: MV Protection Trip

Did they trip on inst or time?  If the inst trip on the 33 kV breaker could "see" the fault, it had to trip.  Also check your device TCC curves.  Phase to phase on the 11 kV side will decrease the time margin between the two device curves.

Also, did it happen on the first trip of the 11 kV relay or was it possibly after some reclosing operations?

Alan

RE: MV Protection Trip


The 2ms difference indicates that both breakers started opening at the same time, just that other took 2ms longer to trip. The trip action has already taken place. ( Also how did you synchronize the clocks in the two relays?, but that is a different question)

It probably has to do with the sensitive E/F setting on 33 kV side and/or also the type of E/F scheme employed. Not enough info.  Harmonics during a fault can fool a realy to think that there is unbalance between phase currents, showing up as E/F.  Difficult to say without any waveform captures.

  

Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com

RE: MV Protection Trip

The phase-phase fault on the 11kV system released enough hot gasses/plasma that rose into the 33kV and provided a path for one of the 33kV phases to flash over.  The 33kV ground relay did not see the 11kV fault, but responded to a 33kV fault caused by the 11kV fault.

RE: MV Protection Trip

Hi.
Please add information.
What are a current amd time setting on the 11kV side OC function?
What is a current and time setting of the 33kV side EF function?

What is a tipe connection to EF input ? dedicated toroid, Holmogen connection.

It's known result of phase to phase fault on the Y ground side.

Best Regards.
Slava
 

RE: MV Protection Trip

(OP)
33 kV OC set to 330A (33 kV) with a 0.4 TMS Standard Inverse, 33 kV EF set to 26 A at 1 sec DT.
11 kV OC Set to 210A (11 kV) with a 0.15 TMS Standard Inverse. The 33 kV HV CB on the 33kV side of the Dyn11 transformer is set to 20 A EF and it didn't see a thing, so i'm leaning towards some sort of mechanical interaction.

All CTs measure the neutral spill of the CT circuits for EF, no fancy coils etc.  

RE: MV Protection Trip

Outside chance: winding movement caused by the through fault resulted in a primary earth fault? It would show up in the transformer DGA if this had occured inside the tank.
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: MV Protection Trip

If I'm correct in my 1 Jul 09 9:59 post then the 33kV relay at the transformer would not have seen the ground fault.  The fault current would have had to been such that the 11kV overcurrent relay took about 1 sec to clear the fault.  Had it been much faster the fault would have been gone and the 33kV would not have tripped.

RE: MV Protection Trip

What David saied.
Are you have DR file of event.
11kV OC is IDMT, EF of 33kV is DT with low current setting.
You must check time grading.
 

RE: MV Protection Trip

I wouldn't worry about time grading or coordination as I would call it.  Any fault that involves only the 11kV will never be seen by the 33kV ground relay.  The only way to get there is two independent but simultaneous faults (how likely is that) or a single fault that involves both systems - a "cross country" fault.  If I'm right, both systems worked as they should have for that fault, a fault the involved both systems.

On the other hand, I'd never want to set primary protection at 1 second.  Both systems could probably be sped up.

RE: MV Protection Trip

(OP)
Thanks for all your help, it remains a mystery. ScottyUK, if there had been a movement of the winding to earth then our transformer dif prot would have operated and it didn't. 11kV relay operated in 0.45 secs as the fault current was around 2kA (do the maths guys). So the 33kV earth fault trip must have been completely independant of the phase trip on the 11kV electrically. I'm happy with my grading. DaVIDBEACH I'M AGREEIN WITH YOU, but can't speed up times as there are so many downstream relays to consider etc. When we upgrade to 66kV on that line i'm putting in line dif prot, cheers.  

RE: MV Protection Trip

A phase-to-phase on a wye side of a Dy transformer has somewhat the appearance of a phase-to-ground on the delta. At 33 kV there is one large current  relative to two smaller currents,which is characteristics of phase-to ground faults , but THERE IS NO  zero sequence current.
I dont know the conclusion what may have happened...

 

RE: MV Protection Trip

OOPS...Missed the fact that it was a 33 kV EF trip initially!

Alan

RE: MV Protection Trip

No, no, no.  There is nothing that can happen on the wye side of a delta-wye transformer that will appear to be a phase-ground fault on the delta side.  Nothing.  I don't know what a Holmogren connection is, but a residual connection only measures zero-sequence, all positive- and all negative-sequence currents are canceled.  The 33kV ground relay, if it is truly a ground relay, did not see the 11kV fault.  End of story.

On the other hand, if the 33kV relay is actually a negative-sequence relay looking at imbalance, that would be a different matter.

The 11kV tripping in 0.45 sec (still way too long for something that close to the 11kV source) then the hot gas from that fault established the ground fault and the ground fault was able to continue without the support of the 11kV fault.

RE: MV Protection Trip

David. I know it's not seems, but:
Ia+Ib+Ic=0, if Ia+Ib+Ic not =0 you have ground-fault trip, and not important what is a reason:
really ground fault, unbalance, inrush or disconnected CT wiring. If you have dedicated toroid, of course no trip, but residual connection it is something other.
And two phase fault on the wye side is unbalnce voltage on the delta side and as result of unbalance voltage-unbalance current.
BTW, what is 0.45sek trip from/to, alingstone , are you have event list, DR fail.

Best Regards.
Slava
 

RE: MV Protection Trip

Sorry slavag, there is nothing you can do on the wye side of a delta wye transformer such that a residual connection on the delta side will see any current.  Obviously a disconnected CT will cause current in the residual because in that case the residual isn't a sum of all three phases.

But any time you have the sum of all three phases flowing into a delta winding, and there is no fault between the CTs and the transformer, the only residual current you can ever see will be due to CT mismatch.  Never from the other side of the transformer.

RE: MV Protection Trip

alingstone.
What is the power of 33/11kV transformer and 33kV CT ratio?
 

RE: MV Protection Trip

Maybe, but probably not.  More than once we've had faults on distribution circuits underbuilt with transmission lines and had the transmission lines trip for the distribution fault due to flash over caused by the products of the distribution fault.  It just surprises me that people are looking for more exotic explanations for something that is just a "feature" of hanging both distribution and transmission on the same poles.

RE: MV Protection Trip

davidbeach !!
I agree with you. I missed the fact that was distribution circuits underbuilt with transmission lines.Could be an evolutive fault to other line.
 

RE: MV Protection Trip

Or maybe:

Short circuit forces from 11 kV fault current in the 11 and 33 kV conductors cause poles and conductors to swing. Swing path of one of the 33 kV conductors intersects a down guy or other grounded object.

I have heard of this scenario causing a line to line fault on the higher voltage circuit when the conductors slap together. Slight alteration for this situation.

RE: MV Protection Trip

I'll accept that possibility too.  We've never had first hand evidence of what the transmission fault was, but distance to fault always puts it in the same area as the distribution fault, never through the transformer and back to the distribution fault location.  But, there aren't that many locations on our system where even the most wildly swinging, but intact, conductor could flash over to an intact guy

RE: MV Protection Trip

davidbeach:
Thanks, just wanted to know your opinion. Your suspicion seems more probable of all scenarios.

I am still not clear what the breaker B operating 2ms AFTER A means. Did it pick up 2ms later or completed opening. Were they acting simultaneously or there is enough time difference to allow for hot gases to travel up 2.5m (8+) feet), cause flash over plus the relay time. Simultaneous operation would be more puzzling.

Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com

RE: MV Protection Trip

2ms is 1/10 cycle at 50Hz (an assumption given 33kV, 11kV, and earth fault).  For all intents and purposes things that happen less than 1/4 cycle apart happen simultaneously.  I took it to mean that some reference, like the 52a contact opening, happened 2ms later on one breaker than on the other.  Since both breakers had to have received a trip command 3-5 (or more) cycles earlier it was just luck of the draw that they happened in that sequence with that time difference.

RE: MV Protection Trip

That is the puzzling part, the secondary flash over 2.5 meter away plus operating time should have resulted in some lag. But again not sure we have the correct data.

Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources