×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CV and orifice or better CV for flashing steam?
2

CV and orifice or better CV for flashing steam?

CV and orifice or better CV for flashing steam?

(OP)
I am checking a calculation where about 160000lb/hr of water from a tank 120°F/60psia drains through around 100' of 6" SCH40 steel pipe and a level control valve to another tank at 1.5psia.  The saturation temperature at this pressure is about 116°F so I would expect flashing.  The originator recognized this and sized an orifice downstream of the CV to take the last 10psi of pressure drop and prevent flashing in the valve.  

My question is, would you consider this to be the best practice or would it be better to go to the valve manufacturer and have them quote a valve with trim to handle the flashing?

Thanks!

RE: CV and orifice or better CV for flashing steam?

The greatest dp is at the vena contracta within the valve body.  Another 10 psi drop after the pressure recovery could worsen the condition.  I would select hard faced trim and forget the plate.

RE: CV and orifice or better CV for flashing steam?

I get cavitation warnings for this service at about 40 psi dP (depends on your valve characteristics of course) and you will run close to 50 psi with your design.  Even with the orifice you will have some cavitation within the valve as JL points out.

What is the min and max flow of your system compared to the 160,000 lb/hr design rate?  The problem with orifices is that they don't have a lot of turndown.  Increase the flow and your valve goes wide open as you run out of dP.  Decrease the flow and the valve effectively takes all the dP.

I'd prefer not having the orifice and select a valve capable of handling a flashing service.

RE: CV and orifice or better CV for flashing steam?

(OP)
160,000 lb/hr would be considered the max expected under normal operation

I estimate 156,000 lb/hr as normal operating condition. During startup of the cycle, the flow will increase proportionally to power output: 35,000 lb/hr at 25%, 90,000 lb/hr at 60%, 122,000 lb/hr at 80%, etc.

I am in agreement when it comes to using an engineered valve.  Adding an orifice was going against my instinct to keep things as simple as possible.  Still relatively "new at this" so I appreciate the advice.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources