×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Determining Factor of Safety of Existing Structure

Determining Factor of Safety of Existing Structure

Determining Factor of Safety of Existing Structure

(OP)
A client asked us to verify that a structure of theirs (i.e., down to/including its individual components) meets a safety factor of 5:1.

To summarize my calculation for FoS:

I calculate the design strength (ϕRn for LRFD (ϕ=0.75), Rn/Ω for ASD (Ω=2)) then divide that by the actual force, P being applied to the member to determine the FoS.

For example:

LL = 10 kips
DL = 10 kips
Rn = 120 kips

LRFD
------
P   = 1.2(10) + 1.6(10) = 28 kips
ϕRn = 90 kips
FoS = 90/28 = 3.21
CHECK: FoS > 5 - NO!

ASD
------
P    = D + L = 20 kips
Rn/Ω = 60 kips
FoS  = 60/20 = 3.00
CHECK: FoS > 5 - NO!

Is this calculation correct?  Or am I adding a safety factor to a safety factor?

For example, should the calculation be this:

Rn = 120 kips
P  = 20 kips
FoS = Rn/P = 6
CHECK: FoS > 5 - YES!

Please help!  And provide any support documents (posting .pdfs, .jpgs, etc.) or document citations if possible.

Thanks!

RE: Determining Factor of Safety of Existing Structure

The last calculation is the correct one, when calculating the FOS, this is the only factor involved.

What type of structure is this? 5 is very high, it is normally 1.5 to 2!

RE: Determining Factor of Safety of Existing Structure

Oh the dreaded factor of safety issue,

I deal with this from time to time when designing temporary structures.  Manufactured scaffolds are typically load tested until FAILURE (i.e., a leg or a brace buckles) and then that load is factored down by 4.0 to get the safe working load (its a little more complicated based on DL and LL F.O.S.).

So when you are asked to calculate a FOS it always gets tricky since by test method it is based on FAILURE load.

I would not include ф = 0.75 in your analysis since this is a reduction factor.  Also Mn is typically based on ZFy, which is the elastic limit, you may want to use Fu... its all based on what you consider failure.

Also if you are using code prescribed live loads, etc.  they may have intrinsic factors of safety that you may have to rationalize in your analysis.  If you are checking against an actual load then it is more direct.

RE: Determining Factor of Safety of Existing Structure

Agreed.

FOS = theoretical load capacity/applied load

no bells, whistles e.t.c. just the raw thoretical values.

RE: Determining Factor of Safety of Existing Structure

I'm more in agreement with MaddEngineer.  

Yielding is not failing.  

You have to use real loads, not factored loads.  Otherwise, you aren't comparing apples to apples.

For an A36 flexural member Fu=58ksi
Therefore, allowable stress with a F.O.S. of 5:
58/5 = 11.6 ksi

In order to meet this F.O.S criteria, the stress in any flexural element, can't exceed 11.6ksi  which is about half of the stress you are allowed by ASD.

RE: Determining Factor of Safety of Existing Structure

agreed as long as the beam is capable of achieving ultimate capacity prior to buckling.

RE: Determining Factor of Safety of Existing Structure

If something yields and the yielding induces extreme deflections in the plastic state, the structure might become unstable and/or unusable (per csd72's remark about buckling)

Failure can be defined as any type of limit state.  Just need to be clear on what limit state you want as your failure point.

 

RE: Determining Factor of Safety of Existing Structure

I agree that "failure" needs to be defined to determine if yielding qualifies as failure. In some cases I think it certainly should, and in others maybe not.

For example, picture a 2d equilateral triangle. Set one side on "ground" and pushing down on the point opposite. As the material deforms, the "base" side will elogate, and the top point will lower. As this process continues, the stress will continue to increase each cycle even if the force is the same. I would say that in this specific case, yielding would constitute failure (or need for life-cycle analysis).

-- MechEng2005

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources