×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

(OP)
Does anyone see an issue with welding a shear tab to both the supporting AND supported member?  AISC only provides a procedure for bolting to the supported member.  Is there a reason for that?

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

It makes an overly stiff pinned connection.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

There is no mechanism to develop a pin with this connection.  Bolted shear tabs have bolt holes to allow some rotation.  Clip angles and end plates will flex when loaded.  A welded-welded shear tab has none of these.

The fact that AISC is silent on this topic should also raise some red flags.  I'd recommend avoiding this one like the plague.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

(OP)
They don't rule out slip-critical bolts which is a little curious.  That would make for an equally stiff pin, right? Especially if you design for slip at strength levels.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

(OP)
That's another question.  If the bolts are the pin mechanism in this connection, then why is the moment on the supporting member ignored?  It seems like the shear tab is a small cant off of the supporting member, but that's not true for the conventional configuration.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

If the supporting member can rotate (torsionally) a sufficient amount to create a pinned end situation, I am OK with this type of connection.

DaveAtkins

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

You can model the behaviour with a 3d model. ANSYS, Visual Nastran etc cand do it. Even with simpler -to this purpose- programs it can be studied.

Redundancy is always a plus to final strength. There is also the code question, sometimes merely trying to keep the things in a particular practice, but sure there must be others that also work.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

(OP)
Why in the world would I want to model this with software?!

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

I have a similar problem.  My shear tab is concurrently a shear connection and an axial load transfer mechanism for a diaphragm drag strut.  LSL bolt holes were provided which kinda screws up my whole drag strut arrangement.  I'm contemplating having the tab welded to the supported member so that the connection can transfer axial force.

Surely the fact that the beam flanges aren't connected to the shear tab can be used to justify some pinned behavior, right?  I'm going to concentrate my welds around the center of the tab to try to minimize the moment transfered.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

(OP)
Kootenya-
I would be careful with welding like that.  You don't want to initiate a crack and have it unzip.  Can you provide slip-critical bolts in the LSL?

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

That's a neat idea SEIT.  I might just do that.  Are we not concerned about the moment resistance of the bolts once they are slip critical?

Also, do welds really unzip?  Don't they have some minor ductility themselves?

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

A welded-welded shear tab connection is just as good as a bolted one.  The plate can flex, giving you the hinge behaviour you want.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

Hokie66,
I know they allow welded-welded single angle connections because the angles can flex, but I am not sure if a welded-welded shear tab is recommended. I am not saying it won't work, but would you want to use it everywhere every time?

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

(OP)
Kootenay-

You still have to look at moment strength, but as you know the LSL doesn't allow for that because the bolts can move in one direction (This isn't quite true if you have more than one vertical column of bolts, but let's leave that aside for now).  If you make it slip-critical and use the slip at strength level loading, then you should be good for counting on no slip right up to ultimate loading.   

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

(OP)
I had to do a yield line analysis for a column cap plate on an existing building once.  It was terribly overstressed using elastic analysis (450%), but using yield line analysis knocked it down to around 125%.  I was quite impressed with that.  I guess that's the extra capacity you get out of 4 yeild lines.  

Anyway, the point was that I used the procedure outlined in my concrete text (McGregor/Wight), because I couldn't find any easy to follow references for steel.  The concrete example was easy to follow and implement.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

slickdeals,

No, I would use welded-bolted shear plates.  Some use bolted-bolted.  But if I had one where the bolts didn't line up for some reason, an acceptable fix would be to weld the plate to the supported member, provided of course the misalignment is not very much.  You would then just have a similar situation as if you cut out both flanges of an otherwise intact section.  Still a pin.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

Hokie, are you talking about the same connection?  How can you have a bolted-bolted shear tab?

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

I don't see a problem with using a welded-welded connection.  I would make sure that the moment capacity of the one weld group is more than the moment capacity of the plate to ensure the plate yields before the weld ruptures.

I wouldn't want to do it because you are probably going to have field erection bolts anyway to get it plumbed up.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

Usually this comes up with a welded-bolted shear tab, where the bolts can't be made up in the field due to a fabrication error.  The obvious fix is to weld the shear tab to the beam web.  However, if this is such a good fix, why hasn't AISC come out and said so?

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

nutte,

Shear tab is not actually in my vocabulary, but I thought I knew what it meant.  I was talking about a shear plate connection between two beams, like in a cantilever and drop-in system.  If the term only applies to a beam connecting to a column, no, bolted-bolted doesn't make sense.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

hokie,

A shear tab is a plate welded to the column and usually bolted to the beam web.  Field bolting is more practical than field welding, so that would be the norm.  In the event that bolt holes do not line up, would you not still consider field welding to be acceptable?

BA

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

We use this as a field fix as well as a way to transfer seismic forces, welding the shear tab to both beams or beam column.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

BA,

It is just the terminology that is different.  In Australia, we just call it a shear plate or web plate.  The word "tab" sounds a bit flimsy, but as long as everybody knows what it means...

As I stated above, I have no problem with a welded-welded shear "tab" to solve a fitup problem.

RE: Shear tab welded to supporting member AND supported member

hokie,

Thanks, I tend to agree.  I would prefer the welded/bolted connection but would settle for welded/welded if required by other factors.  There should be enough elasticity in the welded connections to accommodate normal beam rotations.

 

BA

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources