×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Positions of static pressure sensors for orifice pressure drop meas.

Positions of static pressure sensors for orifice pressure drop meas.

Positions of static pressure sensors for orifice pressure drop meas.

(OP)
Dear colleagues!

I have to measure the pressure drop of orifices.
Now I am reflecting on my meausrement method.
In the vicinity (up- and downstream) of an orifice,
the flow is disturbed.
After the orifice, the static pressure increases again
while the streamlines are attaching again at the pipe walls.

Now, where, in diameters, I have to measure the pressures,
if I want to determine the correct pressure drop over
the orifice?

Is there a method to calculate this and the pressure
increase after the orifice?

Thanks and greetings,
Stephan
 

RE: Positions of static pressure sensors for orifice pressure drop meas.

ASME Book, Fluid Meters, Their Theory and Application, details the unrecoverable losses of orifices, as a percentage of the maximum differential (at the Vena Contracta) pressure.  They also define the location of the Vena Contracta taps.  

The flow distance for complete recovery (to measure the overall loss) is not defined in the ASME reference, and is complicated by the fact that wall frictional losses grow with increasing distance from the orifice.  However, for all orifices the unrecoverable loss approaches 100% of the Vena Contracta signal as the area ratio of the installation (Aorifice / Apipe) approaches zero.  Considering your rather small orifices, you can probably meet the condition of the area ratio approaching zero.  Also be aware that the ASME publication has special considerations for installations below two inch diameter.
 

RE: Positions of static pressure sensors for orifice pressure drop meas.

For flow measurement in piping we normally use flange taps and a paddle type orifice.  Quick change fittings accomplish the same measurement for pipelines etc.  Another technique for measuring the dp is using pipe taps instead of orifice flanges.

Both API and ASME standards include factors depending upon the location of the static pressure tap.  API MPMS 14.3 reflects the downstream tap for orifice flange connections.  The pressure measurement can be absolute or use a gauge pressure transmitter and adjust for atmospheric pressure.  I did not check the standards for using pipe taps or the ISO standard.

RE: Positions of static pressure sensors for orifice pressure drop meas.

Is this the 1/2 to 2 mm orifice of a previous post?

closup taps or even "flange taps" would be almost meaningless without special calibration.

i don't think paddle orifice plate are available for this bore size

regardless any d/p meter of that size requires custom calibration. There are flow labs that do this.

I've dealt with critical flow nozzles with bores of such dimensions and those are available with traceable calibrations at non critical flows.

 

RE: Positions of static pressure sensors for orifice pressure drop meas.

(OP)
Thank you very much for the helpful posts!

But, I am not going to perform flow measurements, I have to measure the dp of the orifices. The orifices will later be uesed as trimming/calibration devices in a hydraulic application.

Hacksaw, yes, it is still the same issue :)

Today I again looked at the discharge coefficient formula:

cd/sqrt(1-ß**4)=(dm/dt)/(A0*sqrt(2*rho*dp)) and the fact that I get cd values larger than one, what is physically nonsense.

So, is it possible that the dp in the formula above is the orifice dp WITHOUT the pressure recovery? So if I would place the downstream static pressure tap directly after the orifice (and not at 8 * diameter downstream, I would measure the a higher dp and the discharge coefficient would be lower ?

Thanks in advance for your comments!
Greetings,
Stephan

RE: Positions of static pressure sensors for orifice pressure drop meas.

I believe your basic equation is incorrect.  The term (dm/dt)is representing mass flow? This term should actually be "Q", the volumetric flowrate.

Your equation must be dimensionally consistent, without exceptions, and it will prove itself dimensionally consistent in any rational units system, Metric, English, etc.  

When checking your dimensions, be sure to differentiate between force and mass, we always label pounds mass as LBm, and pounds force as LBf, they are not interchangeable.

In the English system, they are related by Newton's
F = M * A

1 LBf  =  1 LBm  *   32.174 ft / sec2
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources