×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

SWMM "Time of Concentration"

SWMM "Time of Concentration"

SWMM "Time of Concentration"

(OP)
We have been committed to using SWMM to perform a flood study for a 2.26 square mile urban watershed. The watershed has been divided in to 26 subcatchments.  

It appears SWMM assumes overland flow to determine a "time of concentration" for a subcatchment (from what I can gather, the equation used was developed from a kinematic wave analysis).

With that, I am not entirely comfortable with assuming overland flow in each subcatchment. Although some subcatchments are moderately developed with little drainage infrastructure, others are significantly developed with drainage infrastructure, curbing, et cetera. It is apparent (at least to me) that overland flow in certain subcatchments would be minimal.

I should mention that flow metering data is available for this watershed. Therefore, I do have the ability to adjust the length parameter in the time of concentration equation until a good fit exists between the observed and simulated hydrographs. However, flow metering is not available at the outlet of each subcatchment meaning I could not adjust the length parameter for each subcatchment.

As there are no other options available in SWMM to model a time of concentration, I am looking for some reasoning/verification/etc. behind SWMM's methodology for assuming overland flow.

Thanks in advance!!
 

RE: SWMM "Time of Concentration"

It's standard in the engineering world to use overland flow no more than 25% of total.  This isn't published very often, because the government doesn't like to state what's not in their favor.

 

Want to Learn More About Civil Engineering? Visit:  www.cemp3.info
 

RE: SWMM "Time of Concentration"

I've never used SWMM so I don't know if it's the primary software typically used for this application (I also haven't modeled such a large urban watershed, only rural).  But since time of concentration is such a critical component of the various modeling programs I've used over the years, have you considered using a different program?

 

RE: SWMM "Time of Concentration"

We currently are using XPSWMM and from what I remember SWMM is based on TR20. A condensed version of TR20 is TR55 (several key assumptions are made and applied). This is typically what we use to calculate Tc. Sheet flow (overland) is restricted to a maximum of 100 ft in TR55. The flow is then classified as shallow concentrated flow. If you work through section 3 in TR55, you can vary the Tc for each individual watershed regardless of whether there is drainage infrastructure or not.

RE: SWMM "Time of Concentration"

(OP)
Thanks everyone for the insight.

I have completed further research on the topic, and it appears that SWMM does not calculate a time of concentration. The hydrograph is developed assuming each subcatchment is a non-linear reservior. Flow discharging from the "outlet" of the reservoir (if you will) represents the hydrograph of the subcatchment.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources