×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Truss question!!

Truss question!!

Truss question!!

(OP)
For a pin jointed truss that is statically determinate both externally as well as internally (i.e. no. of members=(2xno. Of joints-3), suppose if the axial force in one of the members is zero, what is the contribution of such member?If I remove that member the truss will become unstable(i.e. no. of members<(2xno. Of joints-3)) at the same time that member is not in a state of stress. Is it that the member contributes just for stability?Can anyone clearify?What should be the minimum cross sectional area of that member?

Help please

RE: Truss question!!

The zero member is just for stability of the truss (but you can remove the node and you will not need this member anymore).
Usually these are being used to reduce the length of the compression members.
The cross section of this type of member it's not so important - the moment of inertia (both directions) counts.
The general rule is that the member used to brace compression member should be able to develop approx. 10% of the force in the member being braced.

RE: Truss question!!

If your truss is significantly long, you might want to consider an unbalanced load, in which case your zero force member will probably receive some load.  

Unbalanced loads are sometimes required by code (wind loads on pitched roofs, snow loads) while some are developed at the discretion of the engineer (unbalanced live loads).

For a floor truss, there will always be times when live loads will not be uniformly placed over your tributary area.  Therefore, your zero-member may be required.

RE: Truss question!!

In a symmetrical truss that has partially or fully parallel chords, the web at the center will have zero axial force under uniform load. However, this doesn't mean you can arbitrarily remove that member. The shear at the ends of the panel will not be zero and will induce added shears and moments in the chords. Also, under an unbalanced snow load, or office loading, the center web force is no longer zero.

Removing the web may not make the truss unstable, but will force you into an indeterminate analysis.

RE: Truss question!!

For the truss theoretical problem, you can remove the member since you keep the structure in triangles.
For any truss in pratice, you have always nonzero axial force members, 'cause truss is a much more complex structure.


CV
carlosvalinhas@netcabo.pt
 
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources