learning Six Sigma = boring
learning Six Sigma = boring
(OP)
I am learning six sigma through the expertrating.com website and it is beyond boring. Any survival tips to get through this. After learning the material, you can take a test and if you pass, you are certified as a black belt according to expertrating.com
Process Engineer with Medical Device, Polymer Extrusion and Food experience looking for work in Minnesota.





RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
It's gonna cost 200 bucks. It may be worth that much. Well, thanks for the heads-up, it made this office laugh.
The reason it is boring is because it is a boring subject. The only thing that makes SS any more interesting than learning statistics from a book, is the teamwork and the real life projects, which of course you aren't getting.
Cheers
Greg Locock
SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
One of the world's only? Is it me or does it not make sense?
And agree - the whole stats/6 sigma stuff is the most mind-numbingly tedious stuff you can do. Probably best done whilst serving a long jail sentence....
Harry
www.tynevalleyplastics.co.uk
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
I have only a shallow knowledge of SS and its purpose, but I'm highly skeptical about its use (probably SS gurus have a term to designate infidels and non-believers and a proper methodology to lead us to the faith), mainly because when managers bring their mouth fulls of something it's because it's flashy and unuseful or it's labour-intensive and non-concluyent.
What is your general opinion on SS? Has anyone experiences getting proper improvements by using it?
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
What they did was sold it to management first. So you START with a cost benefit analysis. That is better psychology than the usual engineer's approach. The same engineer can get to a solution using SS or not, but he is more likely to succeed in getting the fix into production with SS, because it gives him the structured information to talk to the managers.
Cheers
Greg Locock
SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
Try to come up with a business case project, something you (or your management) is concerned about that affects the bottom line. It is even more tedious if you are not in a manufacturing or engineering environment. Having an engineering degree makes the math a breeze, but you must apply the knowledge to something otherwise you will remain bored.
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
This, of course, is primarily due to an end-user bias. When someone is Marketing or Senior Management begins to blather on about the importance of 6 sigma, I tend to let my mind wander. The world of statistics is best left to those who adhere to the discipline of the science, not who wish to leverage the results as a sales technique.
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
Many time process improvements need to be made quicker than SS will allow, so it should be a tool that is available and not always used.
If you put SS BB certified on your resume when looking for a job be prepared to explain your projects. If you haven't done any they will know it was a shady program.
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
Greg Lamberson, BS, MBA
Consultant - Upstream Energy
Website: www.oil-gas-consulting.com
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
It is stats, of course it is boring!
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
I think that if you read up on Deming's work from the 1950s, you'll find substantial parallels with SS. Yet, we don't refer to Deming's work as a "fad" because the Japanese understood his work and recognized what needed to be done, and proceeded to trounce us in the 70s and 80s with significantly better engineered, designed, and manufactured goods.
For the past 40 yrs, we, in the US, have been playing catch-up, with DFM and Concurrent Engineering (CE), but US management would simply jump on the bandwagon for a couple of years and then drop the all pretense of believing the approach and achieving the results.
TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
Written up in every business magazine, plastered on everyone's business cars, etc etc. And then worker bees with nothing else to do jump on the bandwagon as a way of making themselves look special in a world full of middle managers.
Yet, often, the customers don't see any noticeable change in product quality or processes.
Its value is lessened by its ubiquity.
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
Customers of OEMs don't know or care.
I normally laugh when I see that SS stuff on an OEM's business card.
- Steve
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
Cheers
Greg Locock
SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
Take the whole banking crisis. It has been linked back to this one formula for risk that basically made it look like volatile investments were of minimal risk. Banking equivalent of fiddling the books.
In business they can often get away with it, but for us engineers - the laws of physics are strict and unforgiving.
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
Way off the subject, but have to disagree, the banking crisis was in essence caused by the housing crisis which can be traced back to the Community Redevelopment Act passed in 1976. I won't go into a long dissertation on the history of where we got today, both in the burst housing bubble and the directly related banking free fall that we will be paying on for many years to come.
Greg Lamberson, BS, MBA
Consultant - Upstream Energy
Website: www.oil-gas-consulting.com
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
I agree that I oversimplified but anyone who has ever gone for a loan knows that banks are risk averse. How did ordinary banks get involved in such a risky market?
Anyway, back to topic.
atvrulz1,
I always find that putting these things in context makes it a little more interesting. For each subject try to think of it in terms of its application.
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
The CRA was passed in 1976, but went dormant for 15 years +/-. Basically it made it against the law for financial institutions to discrinminate against minorities or low income folks. It stipulated that lending intsitutions could not turn down a higher percentage of low income (those that really couldn't legitamately qualify) than those of higher incomes. The 1st lawsuit against a financial institution was filed in 1993 and a series followed. That forced lending institutions to relax their standards or face lawsuits by the DOJ. Of course that led to risky loans and banks are in business to make a profit. They started looking at how they could cover their losses and potential losses and started packaging these as securities and those that bought them took great risks. It also artificially drove up housing prices because "everyone" could buy a house (supply & demand). That burst as we know and voila. That's a thumbnail, along the way were some who tried to scam the system, no doubt about it - lot's of blame to go around, but for the most part it was self-preservation and then it collapsed.
Greg Lamberson, BS, MBA
Consultant - Upstream Energy
Website: www.oil-gas-consulting.com
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
okay I stand corrected, there is more to it than I realised.
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
there's a good article on the subprime mortgage crisis here:
htt
RE: learning Six Sigma = boring
There is an entire industry based on "consulting"
Here is their business model:
1. Invent new shiny method to making widgets better.
2. Tell the world while collecting nice fees.
3. All the world now knows.
4. GOTO step 1.
Neverending.