×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Applications where 304 is more corrosion resistant than 316

Applications where 304 is more corrosion resistant than 316

Applications where 304 is more corrosion resistant than 316

(OP)
Hello,

I have always assumed that 316SS is an upgrade to 304SS.  One of our mechanical engineers informed me that in some cases 304SS is more corrosion resistant than the 316SS.  I was a little surprised since they are so similar.  Can anyone give me any more information on this?  I was reading online that in highly oxidizing environments, 304SS is better.  Is there any truth to this?

Also, we are thinking about substituting one 304SS valve with 316SS that will be in 20% phosphoric acid and 5% ammonia...would the 304SS be the preferred metal in this case based on corrosion resistance? We would be making the substitution because we have a 316SS valve onsite and cannot wait for 304SS.

RE: Applications where 304 is more corrosion resistant than 316

304 is better in high temp applications, usually.

There is no such thing as material is X is always an upgrade to material Y.  You need to check your conditions and the exact application to determine this.

RE: Applications where 304 is more corrosion resistant than 316

Are you having trouble with 304 in this application?
If so then you need to find out what the impurities in the system are.
The alloys should perform about the same in 20% phosphoric.  The addition of ammonia (nitrate or sulfate) should have little impact.
On the other hand if you have any chlorides in the system you may need something better than 316 to get much better life.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Applications where 304 is more corrosion resistant than 316

In a highly oxidizing, very low halogen environment 304 can outperform 316 because it has a little more Cr.  The Mo and higher Ni don't help in such environments.

You must be careful about welds, because the Cr will partition to the ferrite phase and can allow attack of the lower Cr austenite phase.

Gold is for the mistress - silver for the maid
Copper for the craftsman cunning in his trade.
"Good!" said the Baron, sitting in his hall
But iron - cold iron is the master of them all.
Rudyard Kipling
 

RE: Applications where 304 is more corrosion resistant than 316

Type 304L is much better than Type 316L or any moly bearing stainless steel in nitric acid solutions containing oxidizing species, such as vanadium pentoxide.  Also in some areas of urea production where carbamates are present Type 304L is better than Type 316L

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources