×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Checking a footing for a steel tower

Checking a footing for a steel tower

Checking a footing for a steel tower

(OP)
A 160 ft self supporting tower with three legs is shown in the attached sketch. The unfactored forces are due to wind and ice. A 16'x16'x24" footing was provided with #8 bars at 12-1/2" O.C each way bottom only. Don't you think this pad needs top reinforcing?

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

Yes, without doubt.

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

Yes, based on the forces you have shown, the footing will certainly see negative moment.

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

Ditto. Wind reversal.

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

Yes, just in order to pick up the soil over the footing to resist the OTM.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

(OP)
Thanks all. Now, I had absolutely no doubt that it needs top reinforcing, but wanted to use this case to ask the following question: How often a senior engineer misses basic things like this one?

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

Depends on the senior engineer and how long a time frame we are talking about.  But it probably happens more often than we care to admit.

BA

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

It happens, though this should be obvious to an experienced engineer.  Is it negligence or lack of technical competence?  Neither is good for the engineer or the company, in the event of failure.

This is a good example of why it is necessary to have another engineer review the initial work.  It's basic Quality Assurance.

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

I am not convinced it needs top reinforcing.  The ultimate unreinforced capacity of a 24" thick footing is 14 kf per foot width, assuming 4000 psi concrete (I assumed phi = 0.55, which I think is correct).  That may be enough to support the overburden during overturning, but a computer model of the mat should be run to be sure.  Also remember this is not a point load at the middle of the footing, but three point loads.  This will reduce the bending in the footing.

DaveAtkins

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

(OP)
Dave,
The Canadian concrete standard A23.3-04 doesn't allow using the concrete tensile strength to resist bending. However, I checked to see if Factored Bending moment is smaller than (Mcr/1.2), in which case I would be comfortable without top rebars, but it wasn't the case.  

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

I would put in top reinforcing.

A general rule:
If the footing mainly resists wind overturning then top and bottom reo.
If the footing mainly resists downward load from gravity then bottom reo should be okay.

By the way, you have not shown the horizontal reaction, those pedestals over the footing will be cantilevers in bending.

RE: Checking a footing for a steel tower

(OP)
csd72,
Yes, Thanks you. There is 6.7 K horizontal reaction at each pier.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources