×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API Plan 62

API Plan 62

API Plan 62

(OP)
Can anyone comment on the disadvantages of using wet steam for an API plan 62 in a refinery vacuum bottoms service?

RE: API Plan 62

Wet steam is bad for a Plan 62 just as a general rule. The main concern is if you have wet steam injected into the seal, you will usually vaporize the residual water right at the seal faces (due to the face generated heat). This 'explosion', so to speak, at the interface will usually pop the faces open and in general cause premature face damage and ultimately leakage will ensue.

The best recipe for a steam quench: hot, dry, and not too much. One way you can ensure you get a nice hot / dry steam supply to the mechanical seal is to wrap the quench tubing around the suction or discharge flange prior to injection into the seal cavity. This creates a mini super-heat coil that should help ensure the steam is dry before it can cause damage at the faces. You also do not want a whole lot of steam injected into the gland since you may leave yourself open to bearing damage due to excessive condensate leakage out of the back of the seal and into the bearing housing (thus condensing in the oil). 1 - 3 psi is best, but for a visual a simple 'wisp' out of the back of the gland is what you want. You can also use a small diameter orifice upstream of the seal (.062") to achieve the flow you desire.

One other point to note: make sure you have a good floating or segmented throttle bushing in the seal design to restrict the steam flow to atmosphere. I have have come across seal installs with steam quenches that have a fixed throttle bushing in the gland. This is not optimum as the excessive clearance on the fixed bushing will lend itself to more steam usage and also cool the low pressure side of the seal. This is couterproductive to what you are trying to achieve with the steam quench to begin with. You want this area warm to keep solids from forming in the first place. If you are specifying API 682 requirements for your seal design, then the bushing type should be segmented as a default.  

RE: API Plan 62

BK19702 covered most everything.  

The only other point to make about wet steam, or pump start-up is to line the seam up early.  I usually tell operators to get the steam to the seal a half hour before operating the pump.  That way any condensate that has built up in the steam line to the seal is blown long before the hot product is in the pump.  Imagine water flashing inside the seal- not ideal.  Slugs of water on hot seal faces could cause thermal shock.   Water expanding quickly inside the seal could damage the seal.  

The half hour is long enough that the operators leave it alone for a while, I don't really expect that anyone will watch a clock.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources