×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ConsensusDocs301

ConsensusDocs301

ConsensusDocs301

(OP)
We are starting a new project (estimated value approx $50 million) that has the requirement that the entire design be delivered via BIM. The general contractor (whom the owner has already hired) wants to be the coordinator of the BIM's from various disciplines and he wants all of us to agree to follow ConsensusDocs301. The owner is in agreement with the contractor so it looks like we will have to sign on.

I did a little research into this and have discovered that ConsensusDocs301 was written for contractors. No major engineering organization has endorsed this document. My question is: have any of you used Consensus301 on a BIM project and if so was your experience with it?

Thank you.

RE: ConsensusDocs301

No major engineering organization has endorsed this document.

This raises all sorts of red flags to me.  Have you run this past a lawyer?   

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: ConsensusDocs301

You may want to have a sidebar discussion with the owner...

from what little I have seen and read about these, consensus docs seem to be written to favor the Contractor over the architect or engineer. They are endorsed by essentially every contractor organization out there. See the list:

http://www.consensusdocs.org/about_member-organizations.html

RE: ConsensusDocs301

Quote:

Have you run this past a lawyer?

Well judging from the list of contributors at the front of the document it looks like it is ONLY lawyers who had anything to do with it.

I have yet to work on a project which uses a BIM system and have never come across this but reading through some of the documents on the web it appears to be a partnering type contract between all the parties involved in developing the BIM model.  To what end exactly I am unclear.  

Quote (ConsensusDoc 301 Guidebook):

...parties agree to mutually shared cost saving bonus arrangments for all participants

My experience of partnering contracts is they start out with the best intentions that inevitably some parties become more 'partners' than others. Then human nature takes over and the nice philosophy behind it breaks down as people retreat to their corner.

RE: ConsensusDocs301

The bottom line is you do not have to sign on something you do not agree to. Have your insurance carrier and attorney (if you can afford them) to review the contract.

If you decide to sing something that may work against you, but you want the job badly, it is your decision but a bad one nonetheless.

I just started on my own, I refuse to sign un-insurable and totally unfair language and it works. I also have told myself not to get into any bad contracts. There are enough fair businesses/client around as long as you have quality expertize to offer.
 

RE: ConsensusDocs301

There is mention of the 300 document in the latest issue of Modern Steel Construction Magazine, found here:

Modern Steel Construction, June, 2009   
see page 48

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources