×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Seismic percentage

Seismic percentage

Seismic percentage

(OP)
I have been doing some wind/seismic calculations for relatively light structures.  The wind forces are much higher than the seismic forces in this case due to site locations.

When using the equivalent lateral force procedure I come up with basically a percentage of the weight to use as my base shear.  In the high-seismic areas, how high can this percentage get?  Just wondering what would be the all-out worst case?  50%?  I deal with seismic on such an infrequent basis that I don't have a good feel for the numbers.

RE: Seismic percentage

It really varies depending on your seismic response factor R which is determined by your material and type of construction.  From ASCE 7-05 Table 12-14.1 you can have R values ranging from 1.5 for plain concrete to 8 for buckling restrained braced frames.  Normal light framed wood construction is 6.5.  

In Washington State which is moderately high seismic the percentage of horizontal load to weight for a wood framed structure usually runs below 16%.  My understanding is when you get into the range of horizontal acceleration greater than about 25% the equations aren't realistic.

RE: Seismic percentage

Referring to ASCE 7-05-
Pg. 220 shows areas with Ss=300% = 3.0
Then Fa=1.0 maximum, Sms=3.0, SDS=2.0
In Table 12.2-1, R can be as low as 1.0.
I, importance factor, can be 1.5.
Then Cs = SDS/(R/I)= 3
And V = Cs * W = 300% of W in 12.8.

That's not to say you'd actually see this- you'd try to use a structure type with higher R, for example.  And the jobs I've seen where seismic loading was really high also had site-specific response spectra, so you weren't working off of standard code provisions.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources