Force required to launch object?
Force required to launch object?
(OP)
This seems like an easy equation, and I'm pretty sure I've seen it before, but I am having trouble finding the force required to launch an object.
Here is the background: We had a rod in tension that failed, sending the rod high into the air. We want to try to restrain the rod in the future, so in case it ever fails again it will be contained, and we want to know the force that launched it so we know how much it neds to be restrained.
It was a 188kg rod, that was launched 2.9m completely vertical in the air. Like I said, it seems this SHOULD be an easy calculation, but the best I have been able to find is the initial velocity (calculated at 7.54 m/s), but not the force required to create it.
Thanks for your help! I am sure I will feel stupid when i see how easy this was.
Here is the background: We had a rod in tension that failed, sending the rod high into the air. We want to try to restrain the rod in the future, so in case it ever fails again it will be contained, and we want to know the force that launched it so we know how much it neds to be restrained.
It was a 188kg rod, that was launched 2.9m completely vertical in the air. Like I said, it seems this SHOULD be an easy calculation, but the best I have been able to find is the initial velocity (calculated at 7.54 m/s), but not the force required to create it.
Thanks for your help! I am sure I will feel stupid when i see how easy this was.





RE: Force required to launch object?
RE: Force required to launch object?
RE: Force required to launch object?
If it was launched by pressure then the force is the magnitude of the pressure (in absolute units) times the area.
If it was a mechanical force then F=ma. The acceleration is the change in velocity from "normal operations" to "broke" applied over the duration of the breaking.
For example the force on a bridge abutment caused by a 3 ton SUV traveling at 70 mph is dependent on how long it took to stop. If it was 5 mS then the acceleration is 34000 ft/s^2 and F=3,800,000 lbf.
David
RE: Force required to launch object?
-handleman, CSWP (The new, easy test)
RE: Force required to launch object?
This isn't a "force" problem. It is one of energy absorption.
RE: Force required to launch object?
You basically need something like a chain or other restraint, similar to those in garage door springs.
TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Force required to launch object?
i think you can equate the inital strain energy = stress^2/(2*E) = initial kinetic energy. this'll give you the stess in the part, and so the force acting on it.
RE: Force required to launch object?
As for F=ma, even though I calculated the initial velocity after fracture using V^2=V0^2+2ay, we have no way of determing the "acceleration" of the initial velocity, as we cannot determine how long the fracture took. 10ms, 100ms? We can't find that out.
I calculated the Kinetic Energy, using .5mv^2 to be 5.3kJ immediately after fracture. However, cable is, to my knowledge, rated by strength, so how could I convert the energy into a measure of force? Since KE is work, i tried using W=Fd, with d being the height of launch=2.9m, but that just gives me 1.83kN, the weight of the rod. That can't be right.
I think IR stuff might have the right idea, we may just have to estimate the time of failure, and use that to determine the acceleration at launch, and therefore the force. Using 7.7g's would mean the force is 14.2kN.
RE: Force required to launch object?
My time number is a swag. I originally wrote the post with 10 ms, but the force was 10 times larger, and that looked scary.
However, you should have the original tension applied, yes? and you should have some idea of the way the rod failed, from which you should be able to infer the length of deformation or the propagation time of the failure from physical mechanism.
However, I would tend to agree with others that knowing the force is irrelevant to some degree, since you already know the kinetic energy, which is what the restraint must absorb, without any elastic behavior, otherwise, you'd have a 188 kg object on a rubber band.
TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Force required to launch object?
A longer cable will absorb more energy before breaking than a shorter cable. A cable with some sort of damper will also absorb shock.
Ever been fishing? You can catch big fish on light line, as long as the rod is long enough.
RE: Force required to launch object?
RE: Force required to launch object?
i am assuming the your rod is a reasonably simple rod, and not some "wacked out" geometry.
if it is a link, for example, constant area A, apply a load P, stress is P/A, strain energy is X ... increase P unitll you have the required strain energy, no?
RE: Force required to launch object?
From above: rb1957
"you calculated initial velocity from initial kinetic energy = final potential energy ?
i think you can equate the inital strain energy = stress^2/(2*E) = initial kinetic energy. this'll give you the stess in the part, and so the force acting on it."
--
OK. So, (at least part of) the question becomes what do you know?
How high is the absolute maximum it could go: Top of room? (Did it hit the ceiling?) Top of building, tank edge? (Did it scratch or penetrate an outdoors structure of some kind?) What was minimum height? How far "over" did it go, and what angle was required to get there? What does that trajectory limit place on the height?
From potential energy = initial kinetic energy (after fracture) = stored potential energy (in the compressed parts) + energy lost in the fracture itself + heat lost (probably very, very little in comparison to the others)
You mentioned tension (stored energy in the "pulling" parts.
There is a "lot" of energy "lost" in the compressed parts that created the "pull" in the single broken part, but were NOT themselves broken. These other parts might not (won't be) be themselves broken - though it is possible/probable that a lot of energy was lost in stripping threads and bending other parts.
Example: An arrow is found penetrating a 12" thick target after a 300 foot flight. Energy from your arm and hand and back muscles was stored in the string and bow, and then was lost in air friction, the rise "up" and then (partially) regained in the fall "down" over the flight, and in the heat and shear and physical displacement of the target material away from itself. But some was also lost in compressing the arrow as it was driving into the target. If you know how high the trajectory, you can eliminate some of the smaller losses, and then make assumptions (from horizontal/vertical velocities) how "long" the reaction might have take.
Or you could break the part again> (Not recommended, but it would be fun.)
RE: Force required to launch object?
Cheers
Greg Locock
SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: Force required to launch object?
RE: Force required to launch object?
Get a fall arrest lanyard. 100 bucks from McMaster-Carr. They are designed to stop the fall of a 400lb guy in 3.5 feet. Should work fine to restrain your rod from flying away in 3.5 ft. or less with no worry about rebound.
-handleman, CSWP (The new, easy test)
RE: Force required to launch object?
Please explain how a rod in tension fails and is launched.
If the rod is in tension initially , I would think that it is already restrained at one end and a balancing tensile force exists at the other end. I am guessing like the rest of us.
Why don't you end the mystery and tell us exactly how this thing is initially constrained and then where it fails and how it happens to get launched.
If you can do this<, I suspect you will get a very good answer.
You just can't take a bunch of equations and hope for an answer. Only people playing the stock market do this, but that isn't an exact science like this is.
You haven't stated whether springs or an energy storage system is initially holding it or after failure why it gets launched. I can't visualize how a single fracture would set it free.
I'm always amazed at how many wrong answers can be given to a problem that is not understood from the description of the OP.
RE: Force required to launch object?
RE: Force required to launch object?
The only thing I could think of is that when it snaps in tension and the large lateral force is imparted (from the moment induced by the propagation of the crack across the separation surface), bending and shock forces snap it at a second location further down the shaft near a lateral hard point (a bearing or guide).
That said, once it is free and it has its initial velocity, TheTick has it right - it becomes an energy problem.
I would recommend that some fabric straps, similar to the arrest lanyards handleman talked about, should be used to restrain it. The straps could easily be tested - you know the energy required - 5348J. That's 188kg over a 2.9m fall. If you used 4 straps and required that one strap take 1/3 of the energy (for safety's sake), you test the strap by dropping a 414lb load tied to the strap a little over 3'. If the strap does not break, you're good to go. It has absorbed the energy...
If you "heard" it on the internet, it's guilty until proven innocent. - DCS
http://www.eng-tips.com/supportus.cfm
RE: Force required to launch object?
Fix the root cause, don't patch the failure mode. It sounds like whatever was restraining the rod wasn't strong enough. Based on the mass, height, etc you should be able to calculate how much force was exerted past the max it could hold, then add some for a safety factor.
Otherwise you could be in for a "look ma, watch this!" moment with someone getting seriously hurt.
James Spisich
Design Engineer, CSWP
RE: Force required to launch object?
RE: Force required to launch object?
If you have a free summer, you can solve this wave equation assuming no damping and zero restraint at the restraint end at a worst case time after the rod break, possibly during the compression phase.
By the way, what happened to the OP? Has he lost interest?
RE: Force required to launch object?
I'll try to explain this situation the best I can without a free body diagram, but if it doesn;t come across clearly, i'll draw one up and scan it.
This is a press. The middle has a large hydraulic cylinder with a diaphram on the end that presses down to extract water from towels and other laundry goods. There is a large 6" thick steel plate on the top and bottom, for the hydraulic cylinder to press against.
In the 4 corners are tie rods. They are threaded at the top and bottom, and tightened with hydraulic nuts to develop enough pretension to overcome the pressing force of the press. Between the 2 plates, around the tie rods, are 4 "sleeves" which absorb the compressive stress, only to relieve it when the press is activated.
In other words, it's a very large bolt in pretension. We cut off the nut, and the tension from the bolt caused an opposing force against the sheared-off face, causing launch.
RE: Force required to launch object?
Thanks for clearing up the mystery. Now I see how this rod could launch on any break as designed.
I think you can prevent the launch by capturing the top tiedown nut to the upper plate. Then it would be impossible for the broken rod to be set free, But that capture design would have to be analyzed to make sure it will withstand the large impact force caused by release of the stored energy in the rod.
One way of doing it would have spring capture device designed with a spring constant K such that
1/2F^2/K= maximum energy stored in rod
and the energy stored in the rod is
s^2AL/2E
s= ultimate stress
A coss sectional area
L lentgh of rod
E modulus elasticity
RE: Force required to launch object?
i think you can equate the final proential energy to the original strain energy, determining the tensile stress in the bolt, to the load in the bolt. You can also work from the torque applied to tighten the bolt (T = P*d/5).
RE: Force required to launch object?
If you "heard" it on the internet, it's guilty until proven innocent. - DCS
http://www.eng-tips.com/supportus.cfm
RE: Force required to launch object?
Why not give the tensile rods some "bulges" at each end, so that they won't fit all the way through the holes in the plate? You could even thread the rod farther, and put a pair of nuts between the plates and inside the tubes, if space allows. That way the rods are captured if the nut breaks off (although the nut will still fly due to lengthening of the decompressing tube).