×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

1931 Building
2

1931 Building

1931 Building

(OP)
I have a building built in 1931. It shows a one way rib slab supported by steel beams encased in the rib slab. I have some designations that cannot be found in AISC published data for historical beams. The numbers match some beams, but the exact designation is off, and I'm just trying to determine if it is something that be overlooked, or it means to designate a different beam.

I have a 27C145 and in the book I find a 27x14 or CB272 but the weight is 145.

18C57 shows up as 18x7 1/2 or CB181.

Would these be the same beams. Also, What would the steel strength have been at this point? Unfortunately it is not listed on the structural drawings we have.


(Also we have some of the SHOP drawings for this job!) I love that we can't find this information for buildings that are 3 years old, but have it for a building that is over 75 years old, and during a time where I'm sure shop drawings were not common.

Any help is appreciated.


 

RC
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

 

RE: 1931 Building

2
RC - IMHO it is reasonable to assume the the notes refer to beams with specific height & weight. There were several ways to designate beams during this time and the exact answer is not always obvious. For starters, suggest that you download "AISC Iron & Steel Beams, 1873 to 1952" from this page of my website:
http://www.slideruleera.net/contributions.html
The current AISC Design Guide 15 is based on this 1953 publication, but the 1953 book gives more detailed info.

For your 27C145, see page 45. There are three different entries for 27" beams that weigh 145 lb/ft. If you follow the tedious footnotes, only one of these was available in 1931 and it was made by Carnegie.

For the 18C57, see page 60. There are two different entries for 18" beams that weigh 57 lb/ft. Again, following the footnotes, in 1931 one entry was from Bethlehem the other from Carnegie.

This is where the educated guessing comes in. The letter "C" was the accepted abbreviation for Carnegie in 1931 (see page 4).  I would interpret the "C" in the notes in your examples to mean that the beams specified were made by Carnegie.

 

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: 1931 Building

(OP)
SlideRuleEra,
Thanks for the information. I already have the publication and found everything you had said. I figured this was the way they did it, but I just had to have someone confirm.

It seems you might even have been designing then! wink

 

RC
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

 

RE: 1931 Building

It think in 1931 they were using ASTM A7, 33 ksi. Sometime in the 20's (1924?), they switched from A6 (30 ksi) to A7 (33 ksi).

RE: 1931 Building

And for the other one:

I like this lookup program because it has the older shapes, and because it's search functions for the newer (nowdays) shapes are straightforward.

RE: 1931 Building

RC,

Glad you have found the information you need.  But I was interested in your comment about shop drawings not being common in 1931.  I would have thought the opposite, but agree that it is not common to be able to find them.

RE: 1931 Building

(OP)
hokie,
I was just thinking that the structural engineer called out specific sizes that were unique to a mill and that was used. Maybe I'm wrong.

Anyways, another question, I have a one way rib slab with clay tile forms. The concrete mix is given as 1-2-4 mix.

2 Questions:

1. What does that concrete mix typically get me? Where can I look for information on this?

2. What should I assume for DL of the clay tiles?

Thanks!

RC
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

 

RE: 1931 Building

Anyone think about coupon tests to determine the steel yiels strength and weldability? The interwar years had steel that was improved from WW1 but wasn't yet up to the best quality until after WW2.  

RCraine, what are you doing to this building? Is this an adaptive reuse, modification, or analysis?

RE: 1931 Building

(OP)
Analysis for some storage filing. Currently there are library stacks on most of the flooring, but they want to move flat files in also.

We didn't do any analysis for the library stacks, but the floor was only originally designed for 70 #/ft2.

 

RC
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

 

RE: 1931 Building

(OP)
I understand. Unfortunately they are removing the stacks and replacing them with flat files. The weight for the flat files is ~210 #/ft2, with a 4 foot between walk way.

 

RC
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

 

RE: 1931 Building

(OP)
Follow up question:

The drawings, of course, don't indicate reinforcing steel yield strength. I have found documents from around that time that indicate there were 3 strengths used: 33ksi, 40ksi and 50ksi.

Was one more prevalent than another?  

RC
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

 

RE: 1931 Building

(OP)
Also, I found some information that rebar had not been standardized for area of bars etc. I found some variation in the range of 15% for area.

I am planning on using todays sizes, as they were the worst case of the 3-4 different sizes I found, but was curious for future projects as well.

TIA.

RC
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources