×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

how can determine subgrade modulus
3

how can determine subgrade modulus

how can determine subgrade modulus

(OP)
if I have Beareaing Capacity ( 10 Tn/m² ) , how I can determine The Value of ( Subgrade modulus ) for this soil

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

Do a plate load test.

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

2
. . . and then the fun begins . . .

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

BigH...I forgot to mention you then have to figure out what it means!

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

BigH,
Please rescue me if I slip.
The allowable soil bearing pressure is given for a max. settlment of 25mm (1"), so, conservativle, we can assume that the modulus of subgrade reaction is 40x ABP (in metric units) or equal to ABP (in US units). sounds basic so far right?
my question is: is factor of safelty used for the allowable bearing pressure incororated before the 1" settlement or after. In other words, what caused the 1" settlement: the ABP or ABPx SF?

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

Since I'm exclusively a STRUCTUAL guy, my tendency is to always ask a Geotech guy about Subgrade modulus....  By the way, it is often difficult to get them to commit to a value (probably because is soil is never really elastic).  That's why my old company always made sure that providing this was part of the contract.  

Josh  

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

I would think the elastic modulus would be a good bit stiffer than indicated by the maximum settlement figures.

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

Ailmar - the allowable bearing pressure is, in my view a serviceability issue (viz., settlement).  There is no "factor of safety" on it other than conservatism in estimating the settlements under the bearing pressures.  Allowable bearing capacity is based on shear and, of course there is a safety factor involved or load reduction factors (coming at it from the other end).
 The net allowable bearing pressure to get 25 mm settlement is really size dependent as well. As the footing gets larger, with the same bearing pressure (and assuming consistent soil behaviour below), the settlements will obviously increase.  This is why you will many times see a curve of allowable bearing pressure (for service limit) vs width of footing.  
 You can determine the "operative" subgrade modulus at your bearing pressure from knowing the settlement vs pressure curve for each size of footing.
  Hope this makes sense?  I've got sliding and seepage on the mind today . . .  

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

CarlB:  lol - but you blew it by apologising!!   

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

(OP)
Thank you (Ailmar) & Please Tel me What you Men ( ABP ) ?

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

Allowable bearing pressure (ABP)

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

Rebwar69:  What country are you in?  If you didn't know ABP meant Allowable Bearing Pressure, are you in a fully rationalised Metric country which applied Limit States Design?  I wonder if you are more familiar with UBP (Ultimate Bearing Pressure) and SBP (Sericeability Bearing Pressure).  Be careful when getting advice on these forum...  Our American friends are fine engineers, but their factors and approaches are different, and sometimes require careful conversions.

Also, you'll find they tend to be highly prejudicial against limit states...  This is not meant to be insulting, it is just that WSD (working stress) and ASD (allowable stress) design are only now being replaced in the US.

The funiest comment I have yet seen was that, and I paraphrase, "You want to know the stress, not some multiple of the stress"; As if the stress calculated analytically were ever close to the true stress in the structure!  lol.

Okay, I'll get off my soapbox, but I just wanted to mention in case there was a potential trip hazard in your way...

Cheers,

YS

B.Eng (Carleton)
Working in New Zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

perhaps from India? soapbox - skip if you must!!! bigsmile

sadly we are seeing the US and Canada switching to LFRD.  We will spend hours determining the damn bearing capacity (oops, yes, for only one independent footing) and spend very little time on the issue that counts - what you rightly call the SBP.  
    I, for one, do not see any advantage in the LFRD - as a strutural engineer, you are dealing with materials with covariance values of 10% or less; with soils, our coefficients of variability range from 25 to 40% for most properties and even more.  We deal with sites that just are not uniform (see some of the beautifully drawn cross sections in Krynine and Judd, in Tschebotarioff, in Terzaghi and Peck) Big difference.  Structures, do not dealing with joint planes in a rock mass - or joints infilled with clay; you are not dealing with materials, once you pass the yield value see their strengths drop 5, 10, 100 times. (steel, if I remember right, holds fairly evenly until it again starts to rise to ultimate) - you reach the plastic hinge concept.  You don't deal with thixotropic materials.  You don't deal with materials with water, solids and air all rolled into one mass.  
   It is, in my view, riduculous that we are seeing the "new paradigm" having to calibrate the LFRD load factors to "match" the design methods that many are ready to take out to the scrap bin as they are putatively outdated or inferior.  How does the LFRD model take into account contractors disturbing the foundation material that they are to build on - having to remediate it to a state that is "different" from that assumed in design and yet the "design" doesn't change?  How does the LFRD design take into account a contractor's screw-up in grout strength for a rock or soil anchor?  I have yet to see where the LFRD designs take into account adjacent footings as to the Ultimate state or service limit - other than a paragraph thrown in here or there.  Foundations are seldom singular.    
   We don't live in a design utopia - construction reality is often seriously different.  I think, to get off my soapbox that we all have a tendency of believing computer printouts (even when we don't know what the input terms really mean), of believing methods of analysis (by the way, does the Ultimate limit designs take into account that there are 5 or 6 very different formulations for the end bearing factor of a driven pile . . .?  Naw.) and we forget that "dirt" is a dirty animal that just doesn't always behave to fit the neat little box we try to put it in.  
    (sorry all - its been a stressful few weeks and I am now off to Bali for a little R&R). It's Friday soon, a brew would be nice!

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

i'm glad to see someone else that thinks LRFD for soils is a little ridiculous. i understand it for things like concrete and steel where the materials are essentially "controlled"...but dirt is wild--crazy wild. it varies foot by foot in all three dimensions (x,y.z) where i'm at.

and if anybody deserves a pint, i'd vote for bigh...hell have two!

RE: how can determine subgrade modulus

Right on, BigH.  All I really want from a dirt engineer is a good estimate of how much my footings are likely to settle (or heave).  It's all more art than science anyway, so I really don't understand forcing a new methodology on geotechnical engineers.  The best advice is always based on long term knowledge of local conditions and performance, not on testing and theory.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources