×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

(OP)
Who can tell my why we were seeing 5.0% ratio errors on new ABB SCV CT's with load cables connected? When we disconnected the cables the error was 0.1%. BTW the test set is a Vanguard EZCT.  

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

Does "load" cable refer to secondary circuit?

If so first thought that comes to mind is how much impedance is presented by those cables.  Trying to push too much current through too much secondary impedance of course pushes you into saturation where you see a ratio error.

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

(OP)
Primary cables. This is on a 2400 Vac system. I believe the power cables are 500MCM. We also disconnected the CT secondaries and went directly on the terminals. Same result. It wasn't until we dropped the load cables off the bus that they ratio-ed correctly.

Funny, we tested many CT's in this facility and the CT's in this line-up are the only units that reacted this way? The other CT's are older GE units that have been in-service for 30 years. They all ratio-ed > 1.0%.  

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

(OP)
BTW the older GE CT's were tested with all power cables connected.

Regards

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

Did the cables in any way complete a return path so that the test set could induce a flow of current?

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

(OP)
The line-up is 2 mains and 4 feeder breakers. All new gear. It's a new install. Of the 6 breakers in the line up 4 are terminated with power cables. When we tested the CT's on the 2 feeders with no cables landed the results were within spec. Shortly there after I pulled a cable from one of the other feeders and we retested the CT and it was perfect. From 5.0% error to 0.3% w/o the cable.

Nothing making sense.  

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

Sounds like you have a path for primary current through those cables that you've overlooked so far. Circuit earth and/or busbar earth at the local and/or remote end? Drain earths? If the installation is wrong then maybe armour / shield currents are another possibility?
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

I agree with Scotty. You must will be inducing a voltage in any cables passing through the CT under test. If there is a return path allowing the induced voltage to cause a current flow it will skew your test results.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

Yep...very likely not a CT problem, but a test problem with performing the test with the CT's primary connected.
 

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

I'll toss in my vote for a current loop on the primary also.  You need to find that current loop first thing, it probably indicates other problems.

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

There's a good problem...

A current loop on the primary, though, is usually detectable as a downward change in saturation voltage.  You DID check saturation voltage, did you not?

 

old field guy

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

(OP)
Scotty is correct. My bad I should have recognized the fact that the cables were grounded at the opposite end!?!?!? Doh

I looked over the circuit again this am and there it was, grounded cables. Lesson learned.

OFG, the saturation voltage was about 130 volts. I suppose the ground loop could influence the saturation voltage. I'm not really clear on that. Explain.

Thanks

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

Ceast:

If there is a current path, a loop through the primary, as voltage is raised on the secondary to perform saturation tests, as soon as the secondary voltage is sufficient to flow current through the inadvertent primary path, current will flow.  On the secondary winding, this will appear as if the core has reached saturation.  This value will be noticeably lower than the actual saturation voltage.

That is why saturation tests of installed CT's are important.  I have found these unintended paths on installed CT's that have resulted in mis-operation on out-of-zone faults in differential and distance schemes.  

old field guy

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

(OP)
Stevenal, that is an extensive read! I need to read it again. Did I read, that stacked CT's can influence each other during testing? Should the none tested CT be shorted while the other is under test?  

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

Ceast,

With the primary current loop in place, the stacked CTs did influence each other. Normally, they should work independently.

As a general rule, I would keep the untested CT shorted for safety.

 

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

I concur with Stevenal.

Regardless of the question of mutual influence, CTs not under direct test should always be shorted. That's a basic safety precaution.

 

RE: CT Ratio Test Results Distorted By Connected Cables

  
Sorry I'm a little late in commenting, but it sounds like the situation at hand may be describead in IEEE C57.13.1, IEEE Guide for Field Testing of Relaying Current Transformers, ¶ 11.3 Intercore Coupling Check.    
    
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources