×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Modelling with Phase2 finite element software by Rocscience

Modelling with Phase2 finite element software by Rocscience

Modelling with Phase2 finite element software by Rocscience

(OP)
We recently purchased a copy of Phase2 by rocscience and we've been getting some weird results when modelling a shored excavation.  The program is coming back with higher delflections and reactions for the example WITHOUT hydrostatic pressure.  Somehow I could not get my point across to rocsience (although they were very courteous) and still ended up without an answer to my question.  It seems to me that, by inspection, a shoring system exposed to water pressure behind it whould experience higher reactions.

Anyone out there with experience with Phase2 or with an opinion on the subject is welcome to contribute.

Thanks

RE: Modelling with Phase2 finite element software by Rocscience

Do not have experience with Phase2 but am planning to try it out soon. Assuming you are using limit state, if the soil is submerged, the soil will have the bouyent weight multiplied by the cofficent of active pressure, and the full 62 psf pressure for the water. I know this sounds like soils 101, but sometimes getting new programs to do what you want them to do isn't as easy as they make it out to be. I would check to make sure that the water pressure is being added and it is not being factored by Ka. If it is, the load would be less than dry soil.

RE: Modelling with Phase2 finite element software by Rocscience

(OP)
I think the problem is beyond using the soil's boyant weight factor by Ka, because even then the unfactored hydrostatic pressure of the water is still applicable and it should result in higher reactions, which is not hapening.

I have also compared it to Plaxis and to our inhouse software, the trend is consistent. After several correspondences with Rocscience they ended up suggesting modelling the pile as a liner and aply the ater presure as a distributed load, which is not practical at all especially for phased construction simulation.  I mean we buy the software in order to optimize on our time and reduce the possibility of error.

The correspondence with Rocscience was courteous but the technical response was not convincing and it seems that we were going in circles to resolve what should be straight forward issue.  Bottom line I do not see myself able to release the software for utilization by our engineers before I am reasonably satisfied of its adequacy, whcih does not seem to be the case for shored excavation where a water table is involved.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources