×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NFPA 96 Duct Velocity

NFPA 96 Duct Velocity

NFPA 96 Duct Velocity

(OP)
When calculating the minimum grease duct exhaust velocity in a square duct, am I to use the circular round equivalent to calculate the duct area or just multiply the length by width?  For HVAC systems, I was taught to use circular equivalent, but I've seen equipment manufacturers use the straight-forward length * width approach.

Example: 1,800 cfm in a 12"x12" duct.  Per NFPA, is the velocity 1,800 ft/min [1,800 cfm / 1 sq. ft] or is the velocity 1,917 ft/min [1,800 cfm / (PI* 13.12 inches^2 / 4]?

Thanks in advance.

RE: NFPA 96 Duct Velocity

I would always use the circular equivalent.  The air does not know if it is used for air conditioning or for exhausting uranium dust.  Always fall back on the basics.

RE: NFPA 96 Duct Velocity

always use the circular area equivalent, as the molecules don't know the geometry, but be aware of issues related to the geometry.  in long, straight sections, flow will be less in the corners of square or rectangular duct, and turns in square present similar issues relative to round, so if you have particulates or entrained droplets, you can expect buildup or extra abrasion/erosion in those locations.

RE: NFPA 96 Duct Velocity

I use the Trane ductalator's and match up the rectangular size to the velocity.

I recall a senior engineer telling me that the ductalator takes into effect the minimal velocities around the edges of the rectangular duct, when calculating the velocity.

I have compared your equation to this and found them to be off, especially when the cfm gets up over 5000 cfm.

I have not considered using the circular equivalent (but probably should)  

knowledge is power

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources