×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

What's your company's PSV maintenance philosophy

What's your company's PSV maintenance philosophy

What's your company's PSV maintenance philosophy

(OP)
Dear Eng-tips members, could you please broadly describe your company's relief valve maintenance philosophy.

My work place was using an empirical approach that took performance and reported condition into account when setting overhaul intervals... but we're now moving to a SIL based PRV management process that doesn't take into account any condition data gleaned from the overhaul. This concerns me and the SIL process allows large interval increases (up to the predetermined maximum) which appear excessive. No consideration is given to condition information if the PRV passes the as received bench test.

In a nutshell, we're using the equation PFD=0.5xLambdaxT.

The allocated lambda (failure rate) is either based on actual failure data (if determinable) or taken from industry tables that relate to an assessment of service condition - i.e., clean, dirty, fouling etc., in conjunction with the type of valve e.g. pilot, PV vent, conventional PRV etc.

So clean service conventionals have a low lambda, i.e., low failure rate, where as clean service pilot ops have a high lamda, i.e., a known higer failure rate.

In addition, at our plant every PRV is treated as a safety critical device, i.e., it is seen as a last line of defence before an imminent uncontrolled Loss of containment. This means that every PRV has the same high maintenance priority when they're due for overhaul and work is being planned in amongst all the other priorities that struggle for resources. This leaves maintenance with a incentive to increase the time between overhauls for PRV's...

That pretty much covers our plant's philosophy on managing maintenance for PRV's.


How does your work place manage PRV's?  

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Life! No one get's out of it alive."
"The trick is to grow up without growing old..."

RE: What's your company's PSV maintenance philosophy

Our PSV's are managed by PM's and our Inspector's measure compliance. We have a formal approval process for changing PM frequencies that is reviewed & signed off by various groups based on the valve histories and consequence of them not functioning. (Qualitative risk assessment)

We also Jurisdictional boundries to manage within.

Our Inspectors assess the appropriateness of each valve frequency each time a valve is serviced.

I would not trust a statistcal approach, each valve is a critical safeguarding device and shoud be treated as such.

Good luck

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources