×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

RTD - Selectable Excitation Current

RTD - Selectable Excitation Current

RTD - Selectable Excitation Current

(OP)
Hi

I'm working on an RTD temperature sensor module that must have up to three levels of redundancy, ie, upto three modules can simultaneously monitor the one RTD sensor.

I have a circuit in mind that wiil supply the 1mA RTD excitation current (see below).

The problem I have is that, when upto two other modules are connected, I need to reduce the excitation current of each module down to either 0.5mA or 0.33mA to ensure that the current sum stays at 1mA.

I was after some advice as to whether the below circuit would be suitable if I made RREF selectable, ie, 2K5, 5K and 7K5 for 1, 0.5 and 0.33mA respectively ? Or throw it away in favour of a better suggestion ?

Any advice gratefully received

Gary

http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=bceed805-aea6-4726-abed-cad17a7abf37&;file=RTD_Constant_Current.JPG
 

RE: RTD - Selectable Excitation Current

Any reason why you aren't using three RTDs?
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: RTD - Selectable Excitation Current

Is the RTD so reliable, and the modules so unreliable that such a configuration makes sense?  

Also, if the modules are that unreliable, why wouldn't they fail in such a fashion so as to kill the ability of the working modules to sense the RTD?

I agree with Scotty that the optimum configuration is 3 independent RTDs and modules .  That said, there may be other constraints that you haven't revealed yet.  If so, then your design needs to ensure that the single RTD isn't the pinchpoint of the system, and that failure of any of the modules doesn't affect the performance of the others.

Moreover, I would also question why all your modules are simultaneously active.  Assuming some MTBF, then all 3 modules will, on average fail at the same time, which would seem to defeat the notion of redundancy.  A more typical redundancy design would only power up an offline module if the primary module failed.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: RTD - Selectable Excitation Current

IRstuff,

I disagree a little on the concept of redundancy: most redundant instrumentation systems are simultaneously powered up. Often a majority vote or a comparison among peers is used to disregard a defective sensor, but this requires that all are active together.

I can remember a heated discussion a few years ago regarding MTBF and MTTF, and that mean time between failures is different to mean time to failure and can't be interchanged. Not my field some I'm not going to argue it too much.
 
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: RTD - Selectable Excitation Current

Scotty is correct.  Any time you see triple redundancy its for voting.  You can see which unit is wrong by looking at the two correct ones and continue operation.  With only two you have to stop operation because you can't know which is the correctly working one.

The RTD is the most likely failure point so they should be triplicated. Any scheme that has the RTD drivers co-connected to one RTD is bogus and not redundant in any case.

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: RTD - Selectable Excitation Current

Majority voter redundancy is suitable for cases where:
> repair/replacement is difficult/impossible
> the individual components are extremely reliable to start with

If you had a system where these modules had a 1 hour MTBF, then, your system's robustness ends rather quickly with the first failure.

The OP is silent about that, but his concern about "when upto two other modules are connected" implies that he's able to switch them out at will, which is not the same as having all 3 on-line at all times, because the excitation current would then always be the same.  Unless the failed module draws excess power, you might as well just leave it in and keep the excitation current unchanged.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources