×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shell MESC SPE 77/312 vs ISO 15848-1 Class B for Low Fugitive Emission

Shell MESC SPE 77/312 vs ISO 15848-1 Class B for Low Fugitive Emission

Shell MESC SPE 77/312 vs ISO 15848-1 Class B for Low Fugitive Emission

(OP)
Shell MESC SPE 77/312 vs ISO 15848-1 Class B

Are these specs comparable? Which is more stringent?

Thanks,
 

RE: Shell MESC SPE 77/312 vs ISO 15848-1 Class B for Low Fugitive Emission

post um and we'll have a look!

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Shell MESC SPE 77/312 vs ISO 15848-1 Class B for Low Fugitive Emission

the information in the following thread is a bit old, but may be of interest to you.  thread408-64093: Shell SPE 77/312

Patricia Lougheed

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.

RE: Shell MESC SPE 77/312 vs ISO 15848-1 Class B for Low Fugitive Emission

bogiedreamer,
         Shell MESC SPE 77/312 specification until 2005 covered both type test qualification and production acceptance tests of valves with regards to fugitive emissions.  
         Since June 2007 edition, it deals with production tests only, standing as a set of amendments and/or supplements to ISO 15848-2 standard (while the type testing requiremens have been moved into the new Shell MESC SPE 77/300 specification, formerly known as T-2.973.873, which also includes thermal and mechanical cycling, seat leakage and Quality System aspects: see thread408-220025: Shell Approved Valves and thread408-210086: SHELL, CHEVRON, EXXON-MOBIL, CONOCO-PHILLIPS VALVE VENDOR LIST within this Forum).

         In both cases, SPE 77/312 calls for a "sniffer method" helium test (a local, semi-quantitative technique), with the results expressed in terms of a volumetric leak rate (Pa*m3/s or equivalent units): the maximum allowable values are given per mm of valve stem diameter (or per mm of gasket circumference, in case of body to bonnet joints).


         On the other hand, ISO 15848-1 standard deals with valves' classification, qualification and type tests only (as production testing is covered by the above mentioned Part 2); for type testing, only total (or global) measurement techniques are accepted, like "vacuum method" or "flush method" described in Annex A (the second one may use also methane as test medium).


         To answer the original question: even if, in the particular case of emission measurement from the stem packing using helium gas as test medium, the maximum allowable leak rates of Tightness Class B have the same numeric value for both Shell and ISO, the above mentioned differences make the two tests hardly comparable.   



         For more information, please also see:

             -    thread408-48808: Helium ppm to mbar*l/s conversion for Fug. Em.'s;

             -    thread408-100721: Fugitive emmission;

             -    thread408-93211: Fugitive Emmission Test;

             -    thread408-115884: ISO/DIS 15848-1 & -2 std's for Fugitive Emissions testing;

             -    thread408-159429: "approved" valve?;

             -    thread408-191910: FE Class A and Class B Production Testing on Valves;

within this Forum...
 


Hope this helps,        'NGL
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources