×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

R=3 and Steel Design

R=3 and Steel Design

R=3 and Steel Design

(OP)
I have gotten into the habit of performing my lateral analysis of buildings with the response modification coefficient = 3, which falls under the "Structural Systems Not Specifically Detailed for Seismic Resistance" of the IBC code (Table 1617.6.2).

My question is, since I have to develop seismic and wind lateral forces and apply them to the the building per ASCE 7 guidelines, how does using R = 3 help me when I design a steel building.

I am having difficulty in remembering what using R=3 helps me to avoid in terms of the AISC specification, and I can not seem to find it within either the IBC or AISC codes.

RE: R=3 and Steel Design

special seismic detailing is what you can avoid. With R=3 you design it just like you would design any other building

RE: R=3 and Steel Design

It gets you out of having to do all of the seismic detailing required for R>3.  See the Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings.  We do the same thing to get out of the detailing.

RE: R=3 and Steel Design

(OP)
I went back and dug into my design information and found what I was looking for.  Page 6.1-15 of the AISC Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings states, "When the seismic resonse modification coefficient, R, is taken as 3 or less, the structure is not required to satisfy these Provisions, unless specifically required by the applicable building code.

It further states, in the "User Note" that designing with R=3 is generally restricted to SDC A, B, or C.

Thanks for your responses.

RE: R=3 and Steel Design

yes, use R=3 whenever possible.

RE: R=3 and Steel Design

marinaman,
The trade off with a steel Moment-Resting Frame System, which can have a R value of from 3 to 8 depending on how you design & detail the system, is to balance the increased seismic loads from using R=3 with the 2.67 times larger loads (8 divided by 3). The R=3 system require larger members and different connections than the R=8 system. The R=8 system may or may not require more engineering time and cost.

Of course, if you practice in an area of the country that has a lower Ss & S1 then the seismic loads might not govern the design so you are OK.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources