×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

What's wrong with this picture?

What's wrong with this picture?

What's wrong with this picture?

(OP)
One star for the obvious and two stars for the not so obvious with an explanation.

Regards
Dave

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

I think I can see an upright sprinkler turned horizontal, facing the wall.  I also think I see a 1/4 turn ball valve on the supply (that's closed) and there's pressure on the gauge.

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

(OP)
NightMe

Sorry, nope and nope.

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

It looks like a backflow preventor with a downstream expansion tank with a closed drain valve.  There is also an upstream ball valve which is closed.  

This might be a limited area system off a domestic water system.  

The upstream valve  might be closed since the sprinkler system has not been tested yet and the domestic system has water in it.

The expansion tank is being used to compensate for pressure increase in the downstream sprinkler piping - although why it would be needed is uncertain.

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

(OP)
Not quite PEDARRIN2. The fitting with the sprinkler head hints at the real problem here.  ...  Where's the backflow specialists?

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

The backflow prevention unit is installed backwards (flow arrows from sprinkler system to the supply rather than supply to sprinkler piping).

The backflow prevention device is also a RPZ (reduced pressure zone) style which is designed to dump water from the middle bottom port when a backpressure event occurs; there is not drain piping on this RPZ.

It also looks like the sprinkler head has been leaking based on the rust under the head and relatively new steel pipe upstream and downstream.

The white tank appears to be some sort of an attempt to trap air in the system piping? Is that an air line connection controlled by the red handled valve with a check valve between the white tank and the system piping?? Looks like someone tried to install a dry system with no air compressor..........maybe the air kept on dumping due to higher pressure on the downstream side so they flipped the backflow device to resolve the problem! HA HA

The only other possible problem I see is that the system does not have a low point drain.

I am fairly confident this sprinkler system deserves a RED TAG (primarily due to the oreintation of the RPZ Backflow prevention device)!!

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

(OP)
One star for FFP1! The RPZ is indeed installed backwards. And though there is no air gap drain installed here, the problem isn't the drain but the expansion tank. It's maximum rated working pressure is 150psi. Attached is a pic of another glycol loop where the expansion tank failed.

Dave

 

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

Looks like a residential expansion chamber.  Also, I don't see a valve to isolate the expansion chamber for maintenance Figure 7.5.3.2 NFPA 13 - 2002 Edition.

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

(OP)
There did happen to be a valve there. I recently changed out a Watts 150psi WP tank for a Young Engineering unit for an SNC Lavalin asset. The thing was built like a bomb, weighed a ton, and cost 24 times what the Watts goes for. And you wonder why you never see them.

Dave

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

Looks like the sprinkler head may be slightly obstructed from developing a full spray pattern.

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

(OP)
Hmmmm. fair enough. It WOULD be better if that were a pendant wouldn't it?

Dave

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

Not to be picky but I always hated the look of plumbers strap on sprinkler systems.

Not sure but don't expansion tanks need to be mounted vertically?

 

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

SprinklerDesigner2 - You should be able to mount the expansion tank vertically, but as said before if the one that was installed was inexpensive then it definetly was not listed for fire protection use.  The FP ones are about $800 for a small expansion tank.

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

"Attached is a pic of another glycol loop where the expansion tank failed." lightecho (Mechanical)

If this is a glycol loop, where is the fill cup? I suppose that you could use the 1/2" ball valve after the expansion chamber to fill the system with antifreeze.
Also shouldn't there be another isolation valve on the discharge side of the backflow for servicing or is it there before the gauge and I can't see it because of the orientation of the picture?
 

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

(OP)
There is no fill cup or provision for one, there is no upstream isolation valve, The expansion tank was the only means of pressure relief, the existing OS&Y is not tampered or otherwise sealed in the open position, there is no RPZ anywhere between this glycol loop and the domestic supply.... and those were just the problems with the glycol loop.  

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

How about NFPA 13 climb move out of the year 1909 getting rid of anti-freeze systems entirely?

*If* you do one the *right way*, with a UL listed expansion tank etc, putting in a small dry pipe system would be nearly as cheap while saving the customer headaches every year forever.

I don't do anti-freeze loops and haven't for 15 years.

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

Quote:

I don't do anti-freeze loops and haven't for 15 years.

Can you give some more background on that SD2? We use an anti-freeze loop on just about every project we work on. I'm located in Canada, and the majority of the use is small zones near overhead doors.

For us, it's a lower maintenance solution than a dry pipe zone, fewer pipe corrosion issues than dry pipe... generally cheaper too.



 

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

Chris,

I'm near Florida so it's warmer and seeing how it seldom gets below freezing we don't have to fret aver zones near overhead doors. Coldest I've seen it in past 4 years was 24 F and that was cold enough for me.

When I do see anti-freeze systems they tend to be larger than one or two heads.

The cost of an RPZ backflow prevention assembly (EPA required here) plus added to the cost of the expansion tank adds to the cost along with the anti-freeze at $10 per gallon etc.

Annual testing on the backflow will run $100 per year (must be done by someone certified in testing backflows and sprinklers) and that goes on forever.  Add to this the cost of draining/re-mixing the anti-freeze and I wouldn't touch the smallest one for less than $250 per year total. This goes on forever.  

Yes, they are cheaper but I'm opinionated and don't like them.
 

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

(OP)
Florida! humbug... It's 8C here right now ... and we're HAPPY about it.

I'm "up here" also. The first example above is 3 sprinklers protecting a small loading bay of a grocery store, the other is 12 sprinklers at the entrance to an underground parkade. I would say that a dry system will cost significantly more initially, most certainly if you have to have a dedicated compressor. But then as SD points out there's the ongoing maintenance costs....

Personally I can't stand the stuff.

Dave

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

My concern is the pipe corrosion we've seen in dry pipe systems. It wouldn't be an issue if they were actually dry, but I've seen pipe sections that were 80% filled with rust.

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

(OP)
Well there you go. Maintenance on a dry system would see it flushed every five years to mitigate rust. There's a cost there too.

Dave

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

Personally, I would like to see an air dryer required on dry systems. Why should we be pumping moisture into the system via the compressor?

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

SD2. I am out here in Northern Colorado and we use anti freeze wherever we can. I agree that in most large scale situations a dry system can reduce the cost (especially with a listed tank)but we have found ways around that. All of the AHJ's in our area have accepted figure 7.6.3.1 with a loop and the 1/32 hole check valve without the tank. The reason being that the wet system it's attached to will act as the expansion chamber. Depending on the situation (new system vs addition/Tenant improvement) the upgrade from a double check to RPZ is typically cheaper than installing a dry system. We have also been known to install a small RPZ at the beginning on the anti freeze as opposed to a large RPZ at the riser.

Just as a side note. Most of the water districts in our area are accepting glycerin in the anti freeze without the addition of the RPZ as it is food grade and does not pose a threat to public health.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources