×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pipeline vs Truck

Pipeline vs Truck

Pipeline vs Truck

(OP)
Hello,
I wonder if someone ever calculate the comparation of power consumption between the thick mud transportation by pipeline and by truck.
If necessary
The capacity is say it 300 m3/hr
height 250 m and length 2000 m. But for dump truck, it should be much longer because dump trucks have to take round way.
The solid content is, say it, 50% and the sg 1.8 to 2.2.
Thank you.
with best regards

RE: Pipeline vs Truck

You might try to explain why you're transporting "thick mud" and how far and how often.

For produced water, the analysis between trucking and pipeline is done for nearly every project, but the source and sink are geographically fixed.  When I think of uses of "mud" I can't imagine that the uses of it would be geographically fixed.

David

RE: Pipeline vs Truck

(OP)
Thanks David,
It is in the open pit mining sites. We are used to applying trucks to transport thin mud(o-o not thick-sorry, misters)after dewatering. (Actually they add it with dry solid) for better handling.
First, I guess pipeline is better, because the trucks also carry their own weight. But I am not sure, because the empiric diesel oil consumption is so low, according to the users.
Again, sorry David and all of you. The mud is very thin slurry, beyond the range of centrifugal slurry pumps capability.
Thanks,
Muwardi
 

RE: Pipeline vs Truck

The move over the years in the heavy oil sand industry has been from conveyors originally when distances were short, to heavy haulers (200 ton trucks) as distances increased, to pipe lines as distances increased further.
Two caveats;
I understand that there may be some pre-separation in a properly designed pipeline which saves some downstream costs.
These decisions are made on the basis of total cost, not just the cost of energy.
 

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Pipeline vs Truck

Permitting issues (now very, very restrictive!) throw a whole new handful of sand into the calculation.

"Driving trucks" on a public road to the site may cause no regulatory attention at all (or cause a lot of attention if they attract a politician/homeowner/layer's interest!) while a pipeline or conveyor belt may need months of paperwork and enviro impact studies on beaver dams and mosquito breeding ponds.

It doesn't matter what the real cost is if a politician or activist group can prevent a cheaper solution from being implemented.

RE: Pipeline vs Truck

and what are the labor rates? $0.25/hour to drive the truck or $25/hr.

Where is this operation at, Bangladesh or New York?

What happens if the flow stops on a full pipeline of that mud?  Disaster?

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Pipeline vs Truck

2000 m is 3.2 miles.  Probably wholely contained at the mine site.  In any case, probably not much in the way of permitting, as pipelines go.

If the line stops with mud in it?  Turn on the water pump and move the mud out.

 

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Pipeline vs Truck

Dear Respected 'Big Inch'

I think probably there seems some 'Typo' in Mile's Figure;(2000/1600)=1.25 Mile

and at the most this may be approximated to 1.3 Miles I believe.

Kindly correct this; if I'm not totally mistaken.

Best Regards
Qalander(Chem)

RE: Pipeline vs Truck

(OP)
Actually I want to compare the energy required, in case there is someone ever calculate it for real.
I imagine, for a truck hauling, the vehicles need to bring the truck bodies, one trip full contained and one trip fully empty for one work cycle. In the pipeline (in this case, paste pumping) the stuff which moves is only the mud. But according to the record, trucking needs more power and fuel!
I wiil not calculate too far until social and political cost. Just wonder.

RE: Pipeline vs Truck

Evaluation of other than the captial cost of pump & pipeline, pump power cost and capital cost of truck & fuel, might be found if you consider the flexibility of trucks to change their point of load origin, point of load delivery and route quite easily, where moving a pipeline would be considerably more difficult.  Is it such that the pump might have to be moved as the mining operation progresses, hence causing the pipeline to be lengthened, the route changed, or similar modification, etc.?  

You may want to evaluate using a cost/CYd-mile, which should be easy to obtain from the truck operators and then do a similar resulting unit calculation for a pump & pipeline option.

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources