×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rupture disc versus PSV for HEX Tube Rupture case

Rupture disc versus PSV for HEX Tube Rupture case

Rupture disc versus PSV for HEX Tube Rupture case

(OP)
Hi all,
If I have a HEX tube rupture case, and 10/13 rule is not applied in this case for the LP side. The question is, can I install a PSV which sized for tube rupture flow? Or it is always prudent to have rupture disc installed? Does anyone know if PSV can be used for tube rupture case?
Thanks.

RE: Rupture disc versus PSV for HEX Tube Rupture case

Sure a PSV can be used.  Did it in the past on a S/T heat exchanger in 400-lb steam/frying oil application.

RE: Rupture disc versus PSV for HEX Tube Rupture case

Depends largely on fluids.  Gas on tubeside (high pressure side)and liquid on shellside with more than a 1000 psi differential warrants a transient analysis.

RE: Rupture disc versus PSV for HEX Tube Rupture case

Ummm....

Depends also on maintenance department and how often you expect the event to happen.

PSVs usually, (but not always) will reseat.

You have to weigh the operations and maintenance consequences of disk replacement versus possible valve "stuck-open"

Additionally, the PSV, if made from exotic materials can cost a whole lot more..

Your call...

-MJC

   

RE: Rupture disc versus PSV for HEX Tube Rupture case

(OP)
Thanks to everyone here. My concern is, if there is any code or standard specifies that for tube rupture, PSV is not suitable (as not acting fast enough) and hence rupture disc is the solution.
Does anyone has any opinion on this?

RE: Rupture disc versus PSV for HEX Tube Rupture case

That's what the transient analysis would tell you.  Frequently, as you state, a PRV will not act fast enough.  Also, the analysis will determine a required location of the relief device.  Sometimes it must be right on the vessel (as opposed to the in/out piping).

RE: Rupture disc versus PSV for HEX Tube Rupture case

(OP)
Thanks lizking. Does anyone know what kind of software can be used for this transient analysis?

RE: Rupture disc versus PSV for HEX Tube Rupture case

A safety-relief valve disc has a particular shape so that it begins to lift, it causes a reaction force in the fluid so that the disc "pops" open to the extent of its travel. This happens quite rapidly.  

Your application would be governed by ASME section VIII in the US, and a PSV is acceptable to the ASME.  That code is recognized as LAW in most states.  It also allows for a Rupture disc.  The hot setup is to use both.  Put a nonfragmenting disc under a PSV. Same set pressure.  If the disc bursts, the PSV pops. Then the valve reseats when the event has concluded.  But during the valve's  entire service life before that time it has never been exposed to the process fluid, so it should be in new condition.  The code requires that you have a device between the disc and the valve to allow for (1) indication of a burst disc(2) testing of the valve.  Your PSV vendor can supply this.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources