×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shell thickness to API653

Shell thickness to API653

Shell thickness to API653

(OP)
I have been inspecting a tank which used to have an external pressuriser roof, which has a water trough over the top strake. We have taken some thickness readings on the inside of the tank (the only way to get the actual tank shell thickness readings in this area) and found readings between 2.9 and 3.2mm in some areas.
Drawings show that the plates used for construction were 1/4"(6.35mm) although readings are as large as 7.2mm. The average thickness readings on this strake are still around 6.5mm.
In API653 Cl 4.3.3.1 b) you can work out the t(min) at the locally thinned area. Seismically the thickness only needs to be about 0.7mm thick. this clause goes on to state "t(min) shall not be less than 0.1 in. for any tank course"

My questions are
1 - What is the minimum thickness that we should allow in this area? I believe that the minimum of 0.1 inches relates to the strake (course) thickness which is satisfied (=6.5mm)

2 - What is the extent that this thinning can be considered acceptable? is it up to 2 inches in 8 inches? or up to the length L?

3 - Bearing in mind that the water trough hides the outter (corroding) surface of the tank, the tank needs to be cleaned and NDT done on the internal surface at 1/2 the remaining tank life. If the corrosion rate of 0.11mm/year is used, and only 0.4mm of corrosion remains (2.9mm-0.1 inch), then the tank has to come out in less than 2 years. Is this correct??

In another very similar tank, we cut the trough off the tank completely, now the outter surface has been painted and can be fully inspected from the external, hence problem alleviated. The owner does not want to spend the money removing the trough in this case.

Can any one help with this one?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources