×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

(OP)
Does anyone have any experience/knowledge about using a free machining stainless steel such as 303SE (aka UNS 30323) for a pressure fitting (i.e. a check valve).  

It's for pressurized liquid, up to 6000 psi.

The check valve I'm looking at is currently made from 304 SS and production wants to change it to 303SE for easier machining.

any advice is appreciated.

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

303 is a no-no for pressure vessels, pressure piping, etc.  The 303 alloy has unpredictable strength and ductility due to the sulfur and/or selenium additions, worse corrosion resistance, and no weldability relative to type 304.  It's a loser from the start.

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

(OP)
Thanks for the quick reply.

Are there any other free machining stainless steels that would be acceptable?  

Is there any documentation that substantiates not being able to use it? (I know its not listed as an acceptable material in ASME, but there are a ton of materials that aren't listed but can still be justified)

thanks again!

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

(OP)
like 17-4 H1150 for example?  anyone?

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

btrueblood

Can you provide reliable resources, specs, etc, that forbid the use of 303 and 303SE ?
 

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

Nope.  Just wouldn't do it for 6000 psi service.  I know it is not a listed material in the ASME piping and pressure vessel codes, which doesn't preclude it from being qualified for use anyhow...but can make the process a bit more difficult.  And, have had specific experience with highly variable corrosion rates and strengths of different lots of the material.

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

The reason I asked is that we have a good experience even for 6000psi and up. To what spec you order the material and how are you verify it?

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

The only thing I found is from NASA-STD-(I)-6016 STANDARD MATERIALS AND PROCESSES REQUIREMENTS FOR SPACECRAFT

Here it is:

4.2.2.2.3 Corrosion Resistant Steel Unstabilized, austenitic steels shall not be used above 700° F (371° C). Welded assemblies shall be solution heat-treated and quenched after welding except for the stabilized or low carbon grades such as 321, 347, 316L, and 304L. Service-related corrosion issues are common for free machining alloys such as 303, and these alloys shall not be used in applications where they can get wet.

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

israelkk, we ordered a generic 303 originally, IIRC, i.e. no spec.  I inherited the part, the fittings were made by a local machine shop.  Failures were in fittings used for hot water at relatively modest pressures (below 1000 psi), so your comment about wet service applies.  We tried sourcing "cleaner" varieties of 303, but were more successful with garden-variety 304 stainless, and working on machine processes (lubricants, cutting tools) to get good parts.  We DID see inclusions and stringers in the original 303 parts, that disappeared when we started purchasing from a reputable source vs. cheapest source.  But never got rid of field failures until we went away from 303.

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

We use 303 for dry inert gases with no problem

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

israelkk,
We had issues with 303 due to the sulfide inclusions.  We ended up getting rid of all 303 unless we could show we were at some% or less of tensile stress.
Can't share technical data within the company files, and could not find any public domain data to point to.

RE: 303SE or 30323 Free Machining SS for fittings?

We only purchase 303 with C.O.T from reputeable manufacturers that include heat and batch numbers and assurance that it conforms to specs such ASTM, MIL, AMS etc, as needed. We do not accept dealers C.O.C.

In one of the places I worked we had a warehouse to stock for all materials before approval. Every batch was  metallurgically tested according to the spec and compared to the C.O.T before approved for moving to the supplying warehouse.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources