Old oil painting of arched bridge: was this a real bridge?
Old oil painting of arched bridge: was this a real bridge?
(OP)
Was ( or is ) this a real bridge?
I bought this print of an oil painting at a garage sale. It shows a stone arch bridge with an apartment building over the pier and women washing clothes in the river.
An engineer (?) standing under the arch on the river bank appears to be looking at the underside of the bridge. He is wearing a 3 corner hat .
The bridge appears to be Roman and maybe in southern Spain or Italy.
There are no artist initials or signatures, and the back is blank. A Web search found similiar style paintings by Dutch parinters in the 1800's but nothing close.
Just wondering ..was this a real bridge?
( I've tried to attach a photo )
I bought this print of an oil painting at a garage sale. It shows a stone arch bridge with an apartment building over the pier and women washing clothes in the river.
An engineer (?) standing under the arch on the river bank appears to be looking at the underside of the bridge. He is wearing a 3 corner hat .
The bridge appears to be Roman and maybe in southern Spain or Italy.
There are no artist initials or signatures, and the back is blank. A Web search found similiar style paintings by Dutch parinters in the 1800's but nothing close.
Just wondering ..was this a real bridge?
( I've tried to attach a photo )





RE: Old oil painting of arched bridge: was this a real bridge?
The apartment building was clearly constructed as a tollhouse.
The hole clear through the bridge just under the deck is odd; I thought arch bridges were normally filled with rubble to stablize the arch and support the deck.
The arch's geometry is too imperfect for a standing bridge.
The thinness of the bridge over the keystone is implausible.
It's possible that it represents a real bridge, but must have been drawn from memory and imagination.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
RE: Old oil painting of arched bridge: was this a real bridge?
Antiques roadshow candidate.
RE: Old oil painting of arched bridge: was this a real bridge?
The thickness over the keystone is really too small to be true, but it made it possible to have the light for the area under the bridge. the hole must have been created for effect.
It certainly must have been old when constructed, since the image is probably from the 1700's.
Wouldn't have been nice to have digital cameras in that time period? - We would all know more!!
Dick
RE: Old oil painting of arched bridge: was this a real bridge?
RE: Old oil painting of arched bridge: was this a real bridge?
http://bridgehunter.com/wi/rock/tiffany-stone/
RE: Old oil painting of arched bridge: was this a real bridge?
h
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Bridge