×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings
3

Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

(OP)
I am looking for the causes of low Charpy test results for ASTM A995 gr 1B (CD4MCuN) castings.  All other mechanical & metallurgical results meets requirements but the Charpy results are 50% below the acceptance criteria.  I know the problem is in heat treat (SA + WQ) but I am not exactly sure where.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

foundry1

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

What temperature are you testing at, and what results are you expecting/achieving?

The first thing to look at would be your SA time and temperature, test block section thickness, and transfer time from the H/T oven to the quench. Is your quench tank big enough for the amount of metal being put in it? Is your charpy test temperature correct and not too low?

 

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

(OP)
We are looking for a 3-sample result with a minimum average of of 45J and minimum individual of 36J.  
Temperature is -10C.


There were 4 heats sampled.  The following chart displays the mechanical results along with the average of each charpy tests.

 
           HRB   YIELD  TEN. ELONG RA   AVG CHPY
REQ'D      >28    70    100   16         36-45
HEAT #        
BCBA        24   71.4   111   37   55.6   136
BDBA        27   72.6   111   31   49.4   30
BEBA        23   70.3   113   34   50.6   27.7
CCBA        23   72.4   112   32   50.7   24.3

I do not have all the answers to your questions but intend to find that out.

Thank you for your response.  I look forward to any further input you might have.

foundry1
 

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

foundry1;
I would strongly suggest you or have a met lab perform  metallographic examination of the suspect CVN impact test failures and evaluate their microstructure.  This can be easily done on one of the fractured CVN impact pieces, and use the other piece for SEM evaluation (if rquired). You may find your smoking gun.
 

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

I strongly 2nd metengr's comments.  Try the screening test from A923.  If you have bad microstructure for heat treatment, that will help show you.

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

(OP)
GRoberts,
Thanks for your response.  I've discovered that three of these heats had slightly elevated carbons, max C was .047.  What bearing could this have on these Charpy results or the microstructure?

Foundry1

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

foundry1;
Not much effect for this difference (0.040% versus 0.047% by mass). What is the nitrogen content, and more important did you have the lab analysis done as recommended above?

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

on duplex grades always run the A923 metallography before you waste time doing impacts.  I would suggest the method C corrosion test as well, though the test temperature may be a bit of a problem since the grade isn't listed.  Start with 20C and see what results you get.  You should be able to compare one heat to another this way.
I know a group at ASTM that would really like any data that you generate on this.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

foundry1;
Here is a tip, visit the web page below, scroll to the bottom of the page and download the document titled "Practical Guidelines for the Fabrication of Duplex Stainless Steels."  It is an excellent technical reference document if you will be dealing with duplex stainless steels on a regular basis, and is free.

http://www.imoa.info/moly_uses/moly_grade_stainless_steels/duplex_stainless_steel.html

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

(OP)
Thanks for your responses.  The material specification is A995 Grade 1B.  Nitrogen content was from .23 to .25%  The lab work was done by a Bodycote lab in California.  The metallurgy results for the four heats read as follows:

"Ferite-point count conforms, Exhibits 45.27%* ferrite.
Etch/Mag: ASTM #80/100,200,500X"
"Microstructure conforms, Free from intermetallic phases and precipitates.  Etch/Mag: ASTM #80/100,200,500x"

*These ferrite percentages range from 45.27 to 46.77% for the four heats.

My customer has had to reject these castings based on the Charpy results.  My concern is that if I remake them I will follow exactly the same procedures and practices that produced these rejected castings.  I think the lab made a mistake in the Charpy tests but have no way to prove it and no way to guarantee that they will not do it again.

Any Recommendations?

Foundry1

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

Do you have enough material to re-run CVN impacts using another met lab?

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

(OP)
NO

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

foundry 1,Interesting problem and many valuable suggestions. I have no experience with this alloy chemistry ,but as a general practice I have some comments to make.

It is sad that you do not have additional test piece to offer. The only recourse is now to produce a heat (hope it is economical and sensible) undr exactly similar conditions and have some additional test bars processed.

It is not recommended to draw samples from castings as they may not be sound.

I always make a separate test check and then offer test bars to the customer. this is expensive,but you are confident and can foresee,if there are any issues involved before making an offer

You mentioned that all tests conform to the standards,but the impact results are suspect . Next time arrange a witness test and also involve the customer in this program. This will strengthen his confidence in your casting and any minor deviations can be condoned.

It is my experience that carbon plays an important role in imact test values. 0.07% is a big margin,I would be more comfortable with lower carbon.

Can you also check the route that you have issued for making the charge. Are there any issues of tramp elements showing up?

I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." — Thomas Edison
_____________________________________
 

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

Do you have any spare castings that you can remove from the production cycle to cut up and use as test pieces? As things stand at the moment, the product is unacceptable to the customer. Using actual castings for the test should give you a better indication of the properties of the castings themselves. Also, if they do pass, a) the result will tell you that there may be something wrong with the processing of your test blocks and b) you have only lost a few castings instead of an entire heat.

RE: Charpy testing CD4MCuN castings

(OP)
My customer is going to buy the castings but cannot use them as upgrades for their current order.  I am going to duplicate this order to meet their upgrade requirement but pour plenty of test blocks with each heat so this doesn't happen again.  Any suggestions on a good reliable ISO qualified lab to do back-up testing?

Foundry1

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources