×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Lightning Arrestors: EPDM vs Silicon Rubber

Lightning Arrestors: EPDM vs Silicon Rubber

Lightning Arrestors: EPDM vs Silicon Rubber

(OP)
It is my understanding that ethylene Propylene Diene M-class(EPDM)rubber is injected with some type of oil to provide similar properties as silicon rubber. These two types of rubbers (EPDM and Silicon) are utilized to manufacture lightning arrestors which are used to protect medium voltage (5kV to 35 kV) power electric distribution systems. Are there any differences on how long will these two type of materials maintain its insulation properties? Overall, what are the pros and cons with respect to each of the materials, mentioned above, used to manufacture the lightning arrestors? Which one is the best type of lightning arrestor to buy in order to get the most for your dollar?

RE: Lightning Arrestors: EPDM vs Silicon Rubber

If you ask a manufacturer –Siemens for instance –the answer is:
"The Silicone Rubber (SR) insulation for arrester housing demonstrates
excellent pollution layer characteristics Neither water nor dirt can cause fl ashovers,
a signifi cant factor in an arrester's reliability.
The hydrophobic properties of the arrester housing made of SR prevent conductive
moisture from forming on its surface, even when contamination is substantial.
Surface currents and discharges are ruled out. Even the most severe ambient conditions,such as salt fog in coastal regions or dust-laden air in an industrial area, cannot impair the hydrophobicity of SR."
See :
https://www.energy.siemens.com/cms/00000011/en/ueberuns/organizati/highvoltag/arresterdo/Documents/silicone_rubber_ins_1400185.pdf
But as tested by IEEE this is the conclusion:
"Insulation design of polymer housed surge arresters for distribution lines are evaluated by using IEC 1109 based salt fog test. The concept of "rest time" in salt fog tests of housings has been introduced with an effort to give fairness to silicone materials. The method provides a comprehensive evaluation of insulation design of polymer housed surge arresters. However, at this time, the inclusion of a rest time in salt-fog tests of silicone rubber housings is not warranted, as hydrophobicity did not recover completely even after a seven-day rest period"
See: "Evaluation of the insulation design of polymer housed surgearresters using salt-fog test"
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F7083%2F19145%2F00885306.pdf%3Farnumber%3D885306&authDecision=-203

ABB also emphases the Silicon Rubber will be better [see:]
DESIGN AND TESTING OF POLYMER-HOUSED SURGE ARRESTERS
"Both  silicon-  and  EPDM rubber  show  hydrophobic  behaviour  when  new.  The insulator made of EPDM rubber, however, will lose its hydrophobicity quickly and is thus often regarded as a hydrophilic insulator material.
Hydrophobicity  results  in  reduced    creepage  currents during  external  pollution, minimising  electrical discharges on the surface; thereby reducing the effects
of  ageing  phenomena.  The  material  can  lose  its hydrophobicity  if  the  insulator  has  been  subjected  to high leakage currents during a long time due to severe pollution, e.g., salt in combination with moisture. The silicon rubber, though, will recover its hydrophobicity
through  diffusion  of  low  molecular  silicones  to  the surface  restoring  the  original  hydrophobic  behaviour.
The  EPDM  rubber  lacks  this  possibility  completely and  hence  the  material  is  very  likely  to  lose    its hydrophobicity completely with time." See [page 5 from:]
http://library.abb.com/global/scot/scot245.nsf/veritydisplay/3f4d4730395bfff4c1256fce00241963/$File/1998-10%20Abu%20Dhabi%20Cigre.pdf

What ever, my experience is only with porcelain and EPDM .The last seems to be better inside as never exploded there and the first will be still good outside –in a heavy polluted area and mainly close to sea shore.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources