×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shell structure modeling from 3d step files

Shell structure modeling from 3d step files

Shell structure modeling from 3d step files

(OP)
Hi all.

I am curious about what most of you stressed skin (i.e. airframe?) analysts do with regard to producing plate element models from the 3d (non zero skin thickness)data, e.g from a step file.

My current thinking on this is that it is quicker to generate the geometry as native FEMAP emtities such as surfaces, etc. as opposed to importing the step file and midsurfacing, etc.

What do you guys/gals do?

tg

RE: Shell structure modeling from 3d step files

(OP)
Anyone...?

RE: Shell structure modeling from 3d step files

Hi,

I use Patran, not Femap. But I think the process could be  the same.
Anyway, Usually I import the model generated from High end 3d Software as SolidWorks or Proe to a non parametric software like Rhinoceros (but I think many others can do same work).
Then:
1- I simplify the solid model deleting fillets and small surfaces and rebuilding the surfaces to have coincident edges.
2- I make the mid surface or I delete the inner/outer skin depending of what I want to model.
3- I extend the frames to the outer/mid surface.
4- I split the surfaces in way of T joint to have coincidents grids.
5- I subdivide  the surfaces in differents layers in functions of shell property.
Once the model is ready I export the surfaces as Iges and import to Patran to mesh it.
I work with model up to 200000 elements and hundred of property and the process is straightforward.
More time you spend in the cad system easyer will be your job in Patran (Femap) and better will be the model.
If by the way You have access to a Hypermesh license and you can do the mesh generation in Hypermesh then you have the best way to make your model. The mesh generated by Hypermesh is long way superior on that made by Patran and the process is way much faster.
I never design my model directly in patran except if they are so simple that I spend more time in conversion than in building directly in Patran.

Regards

Onda

RE: Shell structure modeling from 3d step files

i'd bet it's 50/50 (importing a step model or starting from scratch) ... both have pros and cons.

i'd also bet that 1/2 way thru you'd wish you'd've chosen the other !

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources