×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Ammonia Storage Tk - Conservation Vents

Ammonia Storage Tk - Conservation Vents

Ammonia Storage Tk - Conservation Vents

(OP)
We are converting a 20,000 gal horizontal tank to storage of 19% aqueous ammonia. The tank is rated for 15 psig. The question came up as to the pressure setting on the conservation vent (We've decide on the vacuum setting at 2 oz.) The VP at 70F is 4.6 psia. Would we be better off setting the vent at a low pressure or higher pressure?  We will be venting to a scrubber.

RE: Ammonia Storage Tk - Conservation Vents


Canned:

You are allowed to set the pressure relief at the MAWP (Maximum Allowable Working Pressure) - which is not the "rated" pressure.  If you have the original fabrication drawings and calculations for the tank you might have that information - or it might be on the name plate of the tank.

I would set the pressuer relief to vent at the highest, safest pressure - which is the MAWP.  You should guide your decisions on the tank by refering to API 2000.

RE: Ammonia Storage Tk - Conservation Vents

canned:

I guess I disagee with Mr. Montemayor or perhaps I do not understand some of the terms used. (This is a rare event)

If your "tank" is a certified ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessel (ie has an ASME name plate with registration number), then the design pressure is the MAWP (maximum allowable working pressure) and ASME states that a relief device is required, of a certain capacity, and must be set no higher than the MAWP.

I do not understand the above usage of the term "rated".

In the course that I teach, I find it much clearer to always use the term MAWP (as defined by ASME)

API 2000 will provide guidance on flow rates and relief valve settings based on the specific process conditions. But this is different than the requirement for tank integrity and burst protection, which is what ASME addresses.

I agree with the statement about setting the relief device as high as possible....mindful of other considerations.

-MJC

   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources