×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

(OP)
We are adding load to a square building with expansion joints running down the middle in both directions. It has wall bracing in both direction at the exterior wall only.

It seems to me that the because there is only bracing in 2 directions for each quadrant and chords are discontinuous at exp. jts. that in theory building quadrants are not adequately braced. This assumes that there is no frame action, etc. A building unit, normally, needs at least 3 sides braced.

Any comments? Am I missing something here?

  

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

I'm with you.  Bracing on only two adjacent sides of a quadrant does not seem enough.


BA

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

It is not stable and I would never do it. Each segment may be standing because of drywall partitions or the building as a whole may have some type of cantilever action from the ground with the weight of the structure resisting rotation about the concurrent corner (thinking in 3d like a cantilevered angle on pin supports).

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

What a crazy house it is! Do you know why its need such arrangement? And, I don't understand if the chords are discountined at the joints, how could the trusses functioning properly without side effects? A square puzzle.

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

I agree with the others, jike.  Sounds like someone didn't know what they were doing.

 

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

Do these expansion joints allow shear transfer across the joint while preventing tension/compression?

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

What is the size of the square building?  Could you connect the quadrants together and make it one structure?  


BA

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

(OP)
The steel framed upper story is a penthouse about 300 square feet with exp. jts. subdividing it into 4 quadrants. The lower story is slightly larger, CIP cols and inverted tee girders/Precast DT's with exp jts in the same locations. I believe the lower story is stable with the girder lines and perimeter precast walls resisting lateral load. It is the upper story that I have concerns about.

Thanks for the confirmation!

We will have to do something to fix it!

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

The CIP columns might be cantilever columns providing the lateral resistance...you might check for that.

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

A penthouse of 300 SF?  Should that read 3000 SF?


BA

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

Seems so small that it doesn't need joints at all. Maybe the joints are needed in the roofing material only and not the whole structure.
 

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

jike:

Is that what you are going to do - expend the 300 SF penthouse over the entire building?

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

(OP)
JAE: We have already looked at that.

BA:  The 2nd story contains mech. equip and is about
300' x 300'.

JNLJ: Agree, but this is an existing condition, built in 1970.

kslee1000: we are not extending the building, we are adding equipment, but am concerned about the existing stability

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

Study the original design if you can find it. Althought sounds odd, there must be a reason for that building to stand such long period of time. Looks like you did miss something, but I don't mean the design was good, nor say it (stability after addition) isn't a concern. Also check out, do you need to bring it up to the latest code.

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

(OP)
kslee1000:  

I believe it has stood because the columns are short and there is probably some frame action, even though base plates and cap plates are not much larger than columns.

Our concern is that it is a Seismic Category D.

 

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

Has that area has been hit by earthquake event(s)? Guess it hasn't, at least to the magnitude suggested by the seismic regulatory authorities. Otherwise you may not have the chance to work on it (may have already fell to ground).

Anyway, besides the side talks, can you post simple sketches to continue this conversation? I believe many of us here are quite curious about, and interested in, it

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

Jike - can you confirm that the expansion joint extends through the roofing as well - there is no roof level bracing/diaphragm connecting the walls?  

RE: Building divided into 4 quadrants by Exp. Jts.

(OP)
OzEng80:

The diaphragm is completely broken across the expansion joints. Diaphragm does connect to outside walls but is broken at expansion joints. No bracing in the plane of the roof. Expansion joint in roofing also.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources