×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Water tower analysis

Water tower analysis

Water tower analysis

(OP)
For an existing 110' high elevated water tank located in seismic zone 4 would you recommend a static analysis per 97' UBC standards or a full blown site specific dynamic analysis.  Analysis is being performed for a retrofit consideration.  Per 97' UBC if the structures period is less than 0.7 sec then per code you are allowed to perform a static analysis, above 0.7 sec code recommends dynamic.  We have heard from a few source that a dynamic analysis should definitely be performed on a inverted pendulum type structure like this.  Please advise on your theories on how to accurately model this type of structure.

Thanks,
KSP Engineers

RE: Water tower analysis

KSP Engineers,
There is a third option: perform a 97 UBC Scaled Response Spectra (SRA) analysis based upon Ca & Cv from tables. Dynamic solution allows for a reduction to UBC static shear.

Based upon your "inverted pendulum" description, I interpret geometry as a water tank "egg" supported on a single cylindrical pedestal. UBC requires 90% mass participation, which is difficult (if not impossible) to obtain if you model with plate elements: this is due to the fact that the large number of plate elements (& theri local participations) requires an unreasonably high number of modes (& extended process time) to obtain participation.

We have found that taking the following two step procedure yields quick & accurate results:
1. Model the pedestal using cylindrical beam elements with vertical load applied at top (elevation = tank + water combined c.g.). Run Modal Freguency Analyses (MFA) to obtain freguencies & mass participaton. Subdivide vertical column as needed to obtain 90% mass participation using no more than 10 modes per direction. Next run Response Spectra Analyses (RSA). Scale RSA shears to UBC & run DL+Seismic Load Combinations to obtain shear & moment reactions at foundation.
2. Model the tank & pedestal using plate elements with  surface loads applied to tank to simulate weight of contents (water). Run MFA to obtain freguencies & mass participaton. Use sufficient modes to obtain >60% mass participation (30 or so modes will usual suffice). Run RSA using significant modes. Scale RSA shears to UBC & use for Seismic Load Combinations. Compare base reactions to those for Model 1. If in reasonable agreement, OK. In final report Model 2 is submitted as the basis for design, & Model 1 is an attached addenda to support using Model 2 at mass participations < 90%. This should be thoroughly addressed in the forward of the report.

UBC rules are based upon regular building structures. The rules tend to penalize nonbuilding structures such as vessels & stacks. The UBC 90% mass requirement is to insure adequate mass participation in all parts of standard building structures. Mass participation is not a problem in single cylindrical cantilevered structures such as yours. This is proved using the two step procedure given above. Valuable insights on mass participaton & seismic design of nonbuilding structures can be found in the SEAOC Blue Book & Seismic Design Manual Vol 1. They are available on a single "Seismic CD" from UBC at a very reasonable price. The CD contains a number of other good references, including Vol 2 of the UBC, all in PDF format.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources