×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Anodizing vs. CCC

Anodizing vs. CCC

Anodizing vs. CCC

(OP)
I have a document that says for general surfaces of aluminum, the part shall be chromate conversion coated per MIL-C-5541, Class 1A or anodized per MIL-A-8625 Type 1, Class 1.
I like to know, how does one select one process over the other (anodizing vs. CCC)? Any feedback will be helpful.
Thank you.
 

RE: Anodizing vs. CCC

cost
cosmetic reasons
corrosion protection
to name a few

RE: Anodizing vs. CCC

MIL-A-8625 Type 1, Class 1 is superior for corrosion resistance. MIL-C-5541 degrade when exposed for long time to temperatures above 60 C degrees.

RE: Anodizing vs. CCC

metallurgisttaj,

   Chemical conversion coatings are electrically conductive, and very much more fragile than an anodized finish.  (Hexavalent) chromium conversion coatings are not RoHS compliant.

   You can specify RoHS compliant chemical conversion coatings.  

               JHG

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources