×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Anyone using an accelabar to measure flow?

Anyone using an accelabar to measure flow?

Anyone using an accelabar to measure flow?

(OP)
Hi Folks,

Does anyone have any operational experience with using this type of flowmeter?

I'm looking to provide minimum flow protection for a pump and was thinking of using this device due to its (claimed) ability to be mounted in vertical pipe runs and minimal straight lengths...

Thx & Rgds

Loki

RE: Anyone using an accelabar to measure flow?

I have not used the Veris Accelbar or FCI Flowpak.  However I have used V-Cones satisfactorily.  We also use the four-hole orifice plates to minimize straight run.  Several flow technologies to minimize the meter run are worth trying when necessary.  Depending upon the supplier's description of turndown, I would plan on 6:1 instead of 65:1 turndown.

RE: Anyone using an accelabar to measure flow?

(OP)
Thanks JLS.

What kind of results have you had? What have you seen work/fail to work?

I've pretty much seen the same old orifice/dp cell combo - not encountered anything much more exotic. Saw an annubar once...

I must get out more.

Loki

RE: Anyone using an accelabar to measure flow?

The V-cones work very well.  However, unlike an orifice plate you must calibrate the transmitter range based upon an as-built factor.  The supplier provides input to the factory but the actual as-built factor is required for precision.  I have checked sizing with the four-holed orifice plates.  Others bought them.  I understand that our field experience is good but I have not been to the field with these four-holed plates.

RE: Anyone using an accelabar to measure flow?

For JLSeagull:
how do you calculate the 4 hole orifice?
is it simular to the ISO 5167?
Thanks,

RE: Anyone using an accelabar to measure flow?

I think that I used the suppliers engineering toolkit.  I used a regular orifice calculation for the approximate bore area.  However, with this supplier you then select from a choice of a couple of beta ratios.  The calculate the dp or the maximum flow rate for the selected beta.  Once done, purchase a calculation from the supplier.  The inquiry requests the bidder to furnish the conditioning orifice plate and documentation including the calculation with the quotation; and other documentation such as flow calibration certificate, material certificates, etc.  For some clients we might purchase witnessed flow testing for special flow elements.  I don't think that we paid for QA on our orders.

The  

RE: Anyone using an accelabar to measure flow?

Hello Loki,

I will tell you up front that I am from Veris Inc., manufacturer of the Accelabar. However, I will strictly adhere to the posting policies and refrain from posting promotional information.

I would like to address the issue of turndown. JLSeagull is absolutely correct regarding turndown in that the supplier's description of turndown should be examined. Some DP primary elements express their accuracy as a % of RATE, meaning that you can expect the same accuracy from the PRIMARY element whether you are measuring 2" H2O of DP or 150" H2O. DP transmitters, however, usually express accuracy in % of full scale (DP produced slightly above maximum flow) with the accuracy gradually degrading as you move down the scale.

Nearly all flow measurement applications should be viewed as APPLICATION SPECIFIC in regards to turndown. For example, a DP flow meter may be capable of a 10-1 flow turndown, but if your pipeline velocity only produces a DP of 20" H2O full scale for a given meter, to achieve the stated accuracy over 10-1 FLOW turndown (100-1 turndown in DP), the flow meter/DP transmitter would have to measure .2" H2O as accurately as 20" H2O).

Whether it be a vortex meter, V-cone, Accelabar, or a Superduperflowmagic meter, ignore the turndown CLAIMS. If a meter claims a capability of measuring 15,000 GPM down to 500 GPM, is their 30-1 turndown valid if YOUR maximum flow rate is 2000 GPM? No.

Anyone can claim anything. The nuts and bolts come down to running flow calculations and determining the real world accuracy and turndown of your specific application. Independent flow test data, references and performance warranties wouldn't hurt.

Jake

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources